Talk:Lady Cosima Windsor
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Lady Cosima Windsor be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Deletion
[edit]She is too young to have made any notability, or have anything important happen to her, and she will almost certainly never succeed in lineage to the british throne. The article is a stub as is, and has nor purpose. Sheepdean (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC) --Agreed, delete. She's a toddler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.135.32.188 (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I do not see any consensus that we need to delete this article. In fact, the consensus has been to keep all articles about royalty. We have, in some cases, merged articles of young children into their parent's articles. I don't see that happening for British royalty. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- I did not delete the article. I did, in fact, merge it with the article about her parent. There's nothing in this article that cannot be found in the article about her father. I'd like to see where such a consensus was established, though Lady Cosima is not royalty anyway. She is not a princess. She is no more than an infant daughter of an earl by courtesy, much like Lady Mae Wellington. I should repeat once more that she is two years old. There is absolutely nothing that can be said about this toddler. You are probably aware that notability is not inherited.Surtsicna (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Redirect-Class biography articles
- Redirect-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Low-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- NA-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Redirect-Class United Kingdom articles
- NA-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia requested images of royalty and nobility
- Wikipedia requested images of people of the United Kingdom