Jump to content

Talk:La Religieuse (novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 September 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Reasonable arguments have been made by both sides and there isn't anything close to agreement about what the most common name for this book is in English-language reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



La Religieuse (novel)The Nun (novel) – Otis Fellows in his book Diderot(1977) and P.N. Furbank in his book Diderot: A Critical Biography (1992) call the english title of the book The Nun. I think wherever possible the english title of any book should be used as far as possible. In this respect, please see the WP page of Water Margin for a case of a chinese novel with six different english titles in usage one of which is selected as the page name. We need to respect the fact that wikipedia is an encyclopedia for generalists, not specialists, and for this the english titles are preferable since the chinese or french (or other language) titles would come across as gibberish to most people. Further, although this is a request for move for this specific page, the issue really involves all books written by Diderot and in fact all books written by other writers who did not write their books in english. A general discussion about this issue, not about this particular book but related to another book by Diderot, has taken place at User talk:Ritchie333/Archive 30#Help Needed. This is a relevant discussion since the problem we are confronted with is the same: do we retain the original french title of Diderot's book or do we use the equivalent english title(s) used by other scholars. Soham321 (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Chinese name of the book Water Margin is Shui Hu Zhuan which is also spelled as Shui Hu Chuan. Could you please do a database search for these three names (Water Margin, Shui Hu Zhuan, and Shui Hu Chuan) and count the number of times these three names occur in the literature.I don't know which database you are searching otherwise i would have done this myself. Soham321 (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't mean to make it sound like I did anything fancy or complicated. I just did a university library search (which goes through a bunch of databases of journals, ebooks, metadata, etc.). I plugged the other terms in and found 87 articles and 14 books for "Shui Hu Zhuan", 123 articles and 8 books for "Shui Hu Chuan", and 1204 articles and 13 books for "Water Margin". Without an additional term for the latter, though, I don't know how helpful that could be as "water margin" or "water-margin" looks to be a term used in other contexts e.g. "Male burrow digging in a sex role-reversed spider inhabiting water-margin environments". — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites Please tell me the name of any books which use the french name throughout while mentioning the english title as a minor aside. I think if books are placing emphasis on the english title and journal articles are placing emphasis on the french title then we should go with what the books are doing because wikipedia is an encyclopedia for generalists and not specialists. Soham321 (talk) 04:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree. Another option could be The Nun (Diderot). I am ok with either of the two names. Soham321 (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@In ictu oculi: What is your interpretation of the guidelines for this. It sounds like you're basing your decision on whether there exist translations which also translate the title (in the same way). But isn't the questions about what sources about the subject of an article call it? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.