Talk:LJM (company)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LJM (company) was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 10, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

On 27 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from LJM (company) to LJM (company). The result of the discussion was moved.

GA failed

This fails almost every single one of the GA criteria. Please view these criteria, and expand the article considerably with sources and inline citations before nominating again. --Nehrams2020 23:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to fail it again for the same reasons as before. All questionable information should have inline citations and you should have more sources within the article. If possible, add an image or two that has an appropriate license and fair use rationale if necessary. The article needs a lot more expansion, because right now it is looking more like a stub, or very early stages start class. I'd recommend looking at a lot of other GAs to get a better idea of articles that meet the criteria or more ideas for expansion (look at the business articles). Although new information was added in the last attempt, that still needs to be sourced as well. Let me know if you have any questions and I'll try to get back to you as soon as I can. Although the article is a long way off from a GA, keep expanding and citing, and it may one day be a GA. Remember to review the GA criteria. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 21:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it still fail GA or can it get higher now? 128.32.225.98 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LJM (Lea Jeffrey Michael) → LJM

Revert recent move to non-standardly-disambiguated title. The move was done so that "LJM" could be an article on "Limited Joint Mobility", which does not appear to be very notable - no mention of it in article on Diabetes mellitus type 1 or the more general Diabetes mellitus, either abbreviated or in full. The various incoming links to LJM were not updated by the editor who moved the page, and were pointing to a poorly-formatted dab page which I've just changed into a redirect back to this page. I've added a hatnote to this page to point to the 2 other LJMs. Google searches produce 63k hits on "LJM enron", 12k on "LJM diabetes", and 5k on "LJM liberty jet". PamD (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw request - now that various editors have cleared up the mess left when the article was first moved. I agree that in general TLAs are usually best left as dab pages. PamD (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'd have thought Limited Joint Mobility was pretty notable if you suffer from it! However, cannot see any reason why it should be under anything but Limited Joint Mobility. A hatnote does the redirecting job well for anyone who does look erroneously for LJM. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to LJM (limited partnerships) or LJM (company). LJM is inherently ambiguous and this company is referred to under several names in the Enron article. LJM should probably be converted into a dab page. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Page LJM is now a correctly-formatted disambig of 3 choices. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move from "Lea Jeffrey Michael" to "Lea Jeffrey Matthew"

According to two sources, the name is Matthew, not Michael: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2003-11-23/heiress-in-handcuffs "...Lea quit to take care of their first child, Jeffrey. They also have a younger son, Matthew." http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-01-08-fastowsfate_x.htm "...their two grade-school-age sons, Jeffrey and Matthew..." Chrisahn (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Fairly uncontroversial move, no relist necessary. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LJM (Lea Jeffrey Matthew) → LJM (company) – Use more standard disambiguator. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.