Talk:LGV Rhin-Rhône
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
added request for comment on this page from french users to their version of this page. Comments should appear here if they do, although that page doesn't appear to have a lot of editing traffic- Te_aute 9/6/06
Is this article correct? or does Rhin-Rhône refer to the currently non-existent link between Strasbourg and Lyon?
- Sorry, a bit over keen with the copy and paste... Have fixed it. Willkm 21:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
I have added some new data liberally translated from the French site. I have removed the translation request and plan to add more data later. -mrnice
I've completely re-written and expanded from the French wiki article, in my ongoing translation project of all the LGV articles Seann 13:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
My edit
[edit]I did some copyediting, and in that course I inadvertently seem to have deleted a lot of sentences inserted by Geoking66. I did that because, without looking at any prior versions of the text, a lot of those sentences seemed redundant to me. Also, the anglicisation of words like Franche-Comté -> the Frank and Île-de-France -> Island-of-France is, as far as I know, rather uncommon (WP has no redirect from "the Frank" to Franche-Comté). If anyone feels my edits have done unjustice to the text, please revert me. Blur4760 19:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Strasbourg - Mulhouse
[edit]Is a line Strasbourg - Mulhouse in project? It seems not yet. If not we should change article from "LGV Rhin-Rhône is a high-speed railway line under construction running between Strasbourg and Lyon" to "... between Mulhouse and Lyon". Please confirm this issue. -- Armando82 13:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Tgvlogo2000.jpg
[edit]The image Image:Tgvlogo2000.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Inaccurate map
[edit]Some of sections of LGVs shown on the map (added recently by "Classical geographer") do not exist and are not under construction, therefore the map is inaccurate.
What is the point of adding such an inaccurate map in an encyclopedia? Kowart (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LGV Rhin-Rhône. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060128173959/http://www.ass-tgv-rhin-rhone.net/ to http://www.ass-tgv-rhin-rhone.net/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060304175118/http://www.rff.fr/pages/projets/fiche_projet.asp?lg=fr&code=147&codeRegion=9 to http://www.rff.fr/pages/projets/fiche_projet.asp?lg=fr&code=147&codeRegion=9
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)