Talk:LANCO (band)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 15 September 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. As the formatting and capitalization used by independent third party sources are mixed, proper name rules should be used per MOS:TMCAPS. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Zawl 11:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
LANco → Lanco (band) – LANco is an improper way of stylization to me, when "LAN" is for "Lancaster", so I feel that it would be better as "Lanco". JE98 (talk) 15:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Rolling Stone article In ictu oculi (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose for now - the name of the band appears to have been stylized as LANco initially - [1][2] (therefore it is wrong to say that it is an improper stylization), however now LANco, LANCO and Lanco are used in various articles and websites - [3][4][5][6]. I'd say wait and see which one becomes the dominant one first before changing. Hzh (talk) 14:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom's rationale. The caps are pure style, inconsistent with the interpretation, which is for Lancaster & Co, not an acronym. Since Lanco is among the styles is use, as Hzh shows, we might as well use it, per MOS:TM. Dicklyon (talk) 00:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 21 December 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that LANCO (band) be renamed and moved to LANCO. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
LANCO (band) → LANCO – Per the precedent of SHeDAISY, k.d. lang, CCH Pounder, JCPenney, and other articles, non-standard case may be used if there is overwhelming majority to do so. Reputable sources such as AllMusic, People, and Billboard render the name in all-caps, and I found few to no sources referring to the band as just "Lanco".
Of the inbound links, page hits, and non-wikipedia search results, there is almost no traffic for LANCO regarding its use in reference to a defunct airline. By comparison, the band's article has a much larger inbound link and view count.
In short, it seems as if anyone looking for LANCO in all-caps is without question looking for a currently active band, not a short lived defunct airline. And the all-caps spelling seems to be overwhelmingly preferred. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Move to Lanco (band) per MOS:CAPS. The title is not an acronym so it is not necessary to move it to a title it is stylized as. See Finneas, who is also stylized in caps. There is WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC based on page views. Theparties (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak move to Lanco (band) per comments above and sources identified in the previous RM. — BarrelProof (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Move back to Lanco (band) – The May 2023 move to all-caps (undiscussed) was contrary to the consensus at the 2017 RM discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lanco (band). Tony (talk) 04:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Tony1: Why? — BarrelProof (talk) 06:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Consistent with WP's approach to such all-caps names; easier to read. All-caps shouts. Tony (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tony1, do you mean to support Lanco (band) or LANCO? Your comments suggest the former but support would indicate the latter. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Cindarella. I've been ill for a week, and have got a few things wrong. Tony (talk) 04:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tony1, do you mean to support Lanco (band) or LANCO? Your comments suggest the former but support would indicate the latter. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Consistent with WP's approach to such all-caps names; easier to read. All-caps shouts. Tony (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Tony1: Why? — BarrelProof (talk) 06:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Move back to Lanco (band) Per Theparties, there is WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. Also, per WP:TITLETM and this search it is not consistently allcaps, so don't use allcaps. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Country music articles
- Unknown-importance Country music articles
- WikiProject Country music articles
- Start-Class Tennessee articles
- Low-importance Tennessee articles
- Requested moves