Talk:L-class blimp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L-class blimp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

“ZNN-L” designation

According to ZNN, L-class blimps have been designated “ZNN-L”, but this is not mentioned in the article. According to MOS:DABMENTION, the link on the Dab page would have to be removed. TowerDragon (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

L class blimp → L-class blimp
M class blimp → M-class blimp
G class blimp → G-class blimp
N class blimp → N-class blimp
SS class blimp → SS-class blimp
J class blimp → J-class blimp
B class blimp → B-class blimp
D class blimp → D-class blimp
Coastal class blimp → Coastal-class blimp
F class blimp → F-class blimp
NS class blimp → NS-class blimp
E class blimp → E-class blimp
H class blimp → H-class blimp
SSZ class blimp → SSZ-class blimp
SSP class blimp → SSP-class blimp
SST class blimp → SST-class blimp
C-Star class blimp → C-Star-class blimp
TC class blimp → TC-class blimp

– MOS:HYPHEN and WP:NC-SHIPS recommend use of a hyphen for compound modifiers. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support for all: it's not an "L blimp" that also happens to be a "class blimp" so the hyphenlessness here seems like a pretty glaring grammatical error to me.--Xiaphias (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – there's no reason not to use the standard clear English orthography that helps readers parse these as blimp class modifiers. Book sources for these are dominated by wiki mirrors, but there a are quite books a few non-WP for "K-class blimp", which we have correct already. Dicklyon (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – even speedy. Does not have to wait. HandsomeFella (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.