Jump to content

Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLê Văn Duyệt has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 5, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 22, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Le Van Duyet, the last viceroy of the Nguyen Dynasty's Cochinchina, was a eunuch?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 30, 2019, and July 30, 2021.
Current status: Good article

Naming

[edit]

I've just redirected the page from Le Van Duyet to Lê Văn Duyệt, only because the latter is more appropriate for a proper Vietnamese name, it doesn't affect in any way the quality of the article. Grenouille vert (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There's one line in the legacy section that needs a citation. I added a {{cn}} to point out where it is.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
    Images all look good.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:
    Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intersex??

[edit]

Is it appropriate to classify the subject as intersex? He was a eunuch, but that isn't the same thing. AuntFlo (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He naturally born intersex. Due to that reason, he became an eunuch. I have stated this point clearly in the note section.--AM (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

move talk page

[edit]

{{admin help}} Hi. Can someone move this talk page so it matches up with the articles name. AIRcorn (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks AIRcorn (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lê_Văn_Duyệt&oldid=1215384649"