This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
A fact from Léonard Autié appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The article cited Autié's memoirs for a number of different versions of his name, but I wasn't able to find them in this source. Di Profio reproduces some letters ca. 1817 which are signed "Léonard Autié". Also he is indexed by Lister under "Autié, Léonard". Taken together, these seemed like good reasons to move the page. --Robert.Allen (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking an interest. You link to a cover of a translation of his autobiography. I've been trying to find a scan of this online but had no success - just fragments. I'll see if the BL has it as I'm hoping this will clarify the issue of his name(s). My impression is that Léonard was a name which he adopted for professional reasons but we shall see. Warden (talk) 12:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it's most of it (some pages are missing). [I'm referring to the Gallica copy in French: [1].] You have to click the page-turn arrows to read through it. (But it's not text-searchable, unfortunately.) Also, note that BnF used "Léonard, Léonard-Alexis Autié, dit" in the author field (click on the title link just above the image). Yet their Authority control calls him simply "Léonard". A case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing I suppose. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The French Wikipédia use the name "Jean-François". I've added the link to the article. And there is a pic. This certainly calls for more research. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Di Profio has a footnote on p. 43, which reads: "Ce nom est orthographié « Autier » ou plus souvent « Autié ». Sur le coiffeur de la reine, voir André Denjean, « L'enigmatique état civil de Léonard », Bulletin cercle général Languedoc, no 8 (1980), p. 1–2." The French Wikipédia article appears to rely entirely on early 19th-century sources. There was obviously some confusion over his real name. For now, I would favor using the more modern sources, which may be based on more recent information. BTW, the footnote refers to a document ("la registre des affaires de la Conseil") about the granting of his privilege for the Théâtre de Monsieur, in which he is referred to as « Mr. Autier ».--Robert.Allen (talk) 20:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kudos for finding a picture. I can't keep up with you today as it's nearly midnight here. It's great when someone picks up the ball and runs with it like that. By coincidence, some has just greatly expanded another completely different stub I started - the Petersham Hole. Barnstars all round! Warden (talk) 22:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.