Jump to content

Talk:Lärabar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 November 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


LärabarLarabar – Everything in WP:CAMELCASE seems to say that the umlaut above the A should be ignored, despite the branding. Trebuchette (talk) 06:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- /Alex/21 13:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Trebuchette: The only mention of diacritics at MOS:TM says not to correct trademarks by adding them (e.g. Uber→Über). Plenty of reliable sources use the Lärabar spelling. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 13:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
These indeed look like highly relevant examples. I checked their talk pages, and it doesn't look either title has ever been challenged in an RM. I'm actually a little dubious that either would stand up to scrutiny, since it seems like the umlauts aren't used in a clear majority of RS. Colin M (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Häagen-Dazs is similar and the article has an umlaut in the title. Peter James (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.