Talk:Kumbha of Mewar

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Citations

Please could someone add some citations for this article, this is urgent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.20.60.223 (talk) 18:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. If 'Rana' means monarch then it's one of the words we generally omit from noble titles, per the naming conventions. e.g. Pedro I of Brazil rather than Emperor Pedro I. EdJohnston (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kumbha of Mewar → Rana Kumbha – current title lacks important word Rana and has undue word Mewar -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The current title meets the titling standards of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility). The proposed title would not. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inconsistency in the death and aftermath section

The last line of second paragraph of the section suggests Raimal sought the help of Delhi Sultan but in the first line of the same paragraph it is clearly mentioned that Udai Singh wanted intervention of Delhi Sultan to regain his lost kingdom.Also the details regarding the battles during this time are missing.It will be great to have those