Talk:Krajina dinar

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Regarding the desgination (i.e. 1994 dinar)

I don't want to start a revert war either. And I am abiding 3RR. My major concern is that the same style must be deployed to all instances, in this case Yugoslav dinar and Republika Srpska dinar. And we have to make plans for possible future content. I am worried what if there is some currency that is reformed in year 2000. Imagine 2000 dinar = 100 dinar. And what if the ratio in some reform is not a nice number and it happens to be 1800? 1 Brazilian real = 2750 cruzeiro reais I understand you're trying to reduce clutter. There must be something we can come up with. What about 1,000,000 dinara of 1992, 1,000,000 1992-dinara, or something else? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think a good idea is perhaps 1,000,000 dinara from 1992. That may be too long and so 1,000,000 1992-dinara may work. 'Of 1992' doesn't seem right. Putting 1992 dinara in italics seems to be my best idea. Reywas92^Talk 23:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Putting it italic may be difficult to read on some browsers. A dash seems fine to me. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status

I have a 50-million-dinar bill. What is the copyright status? Can I upload a picture of it to Commons? --Error (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krajina Dinar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Krajina Dinar.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Krajina Dinar.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]