This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Kolpak ruling is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
Due to the number of players with EU passports being added to the Kolpak list I have added a comment trying to clarify the difference. However with the press increasingly using 'Kolpak' to refer to any non-England qualified player the distinction is likely to become blurred. Should we consider a note in the text (rather than an invisible comment) on this, or even defining Kolpak as others do? ReadingOldBoy (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly don't think we should define it as the press often do. The comment is fine for now, perhaps it could be mentioned in the text if it continues. Last August when Warne was looking into applying for German citizenship (he can't get it, which I found out in five minutes!) several media outlets were saying that he'd become a Kolpak player, which of course is wrong. I did mention this in an article I wrote on the issue for CricketEurope [1] which I guess could be used as a reference. Andrew nixon (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]