Talk:Kollective

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

On 19 June 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kontiki (company) to Kollective. The result of the discussion was moved.

Untitled

We need to know how this actually works, what it does etc etc. Currently this is just a statement of facts - it is used in iplayer etc without any detail. Secretlondon 08:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This may help Secretlondon 08:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is kontiki's reseller in Europe. Secretlondon 09:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is UPLOADING content to other users a problem for DOWNLOAD limits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y Less (talk • contribs) 10:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because conversation is 2 way. Secretlondon 23:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reality the download side of such a conversation is small in comparison to the upload. The issue is that several ISPs count data uploaded as part of the monthly allowance. paypwip (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

shutting down kservice

To shut down KService after the provider's program has been closed, the command net stop kservice can be entered into the "Run" dialogue accessed from the Windows Start menu. --rjcuk (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

limit CPU usage for kservice

download this software http://mion.faireal.net/BES/ i suggested this feature for this app, it ven mentions it on the author's page. --rjcuk (talk) 23:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic discussion ??

"This extra bandwidth used could make UK ISPs put up their prices or use technical measures such as blocking or traffic shaping to deal with iPlayer traffic. It is estimated that an hour of iPlayer downloads at peak time would cost them 67 pence at BT wholesale prices."

This seems entirely political and not really related to the topic (Kontiki's service uses P2P to deliver content) 90.201.162.242 (talk) 20:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

Kontiki p2p technology powering UK television online services - we know practically nothing.. Secretlondon 08:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has been over 6 months. Has been moved to talk page. Please expand soon. Vinh1000 (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is all now out of date. The BBC dropped Kontiki last year (Dec 2008) for AIR and 4oD is now browser based (not sure when they dropped Kontiki); so neither use Kontiki any more as far as I know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.144.2 (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Help & Moving some content to other pages

I would like to update the logo, but was unable to do so. If someone could help out in this regard that would be great, the URL to the new logo is here: http://kontiki.com/_img/logo.gif

Also it seems that some of the content on this page is not Kontiki specific, I left it for now, but perhaps it should be moved to other pages and referenced from here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwishon (talk • contribs) 17:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of Service

This section looks a bit like advertising to me, and not entirely factually correct. It uses the phrase "can offer a guaranteed [QoS] because it can blend traffic downloaded from peers" but this isn't the entire story - if your local ATM network is running at capacity, for example, you can't guarantee QoS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.231.171 (talk) 14:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved. Between five and six weeks old with no participation says to me that this request should be granted. And it does appear that this company name has become its COMMONNAME. Have a Great Day and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 19:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kontiki (company) → Kollective – Kontiki became Kollective in 2015. Here are two articles referring to this name change: http://cp.wainhouse.com/blog/2015/03/23/kontiki-becomes-kollective https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=1051164 SBrowning123 (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Please could you update the company name to Kollective based on evidence provided above? SBrowning123 (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 15:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.