Talk:Kissing the shuttle

A fact from Kissing the shuttle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that shuttle kissing continued in Lancashire, England, long after it was outlawed in several U.S. states?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kissing the shuttle.

Wikipedia

Mills Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Arrangement of sections

Might I suggest changing the section order to:

Traditional weaving
- Types of Shuttle
  - Suction shuttle
  - Hand-threaded shuttle
Shuttle kissing
Health
- Tuberculosis
- Other occupational health issues

I think it would help the general reader to establish (in order): what we are talking about, what shuttle kissing is, the consequences thereof. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

If it reads better I am perfectly happy to see it done.

I am still getting my head round what to call the shuttles- I can't find good references. there is a third type the self threading/ed shuttle as found in a Northrop. Here is a diagram- I need to clean up the svg, and get a definitive translation. I suspect that this section will be extended.

I can use this a template to draw the other two
Is the eye a tube? - I had problems with this so left it out. The eye on the shuttles I have seen are more like ceramic rings- they don't have the length to make them a tube. But some description is needed.

Yes - if anyone can provide a better description I'm happy, but as you say some description is needed. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is another section that needs to be added - Media. Kissing the Shuttle is the title of some folk music songs and I believe a group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 14:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horrocks

Is there a definitive tie-up between Horrocks, Crewdson and Sons, Centenary Mill (aka Horrockses) and John Horrocks (politician)? I could not find anything on Crewdson in Wiki when I was doing a bit of tidying at lunch-time, but John was in the right place at the right time. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a book- Dickinson 2002- There is a lot of material here- I will keep an eye open for the link. There needs to be a separate Horrock s article which is why I left the redlink in the first place.

Dickinson, T.C. (2002). Cotton Mills of Preston.The power behind the thread. ISBN 1859360963. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Now the distraction is over-- [1] I can start to harvest it. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 13:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grace's Guides: http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Horrockses,_Crewdson_and_Co - will this do?-- Clem Rutter (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That ties it up nicely - I think I can feel a stub or a few edits coming on! Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed line from Tuberculous section

“

The illustrations on this page shows that Jowetts were manufacturing the suction shuttle in 1973.

”

I removed this line from the Tuberculous section because it is self-referential which is best avoided. I also removed it because I don't think the photos actually make that very clear because nowhere in the article or in the photo captions does it mention any years or even Jowetts (which I assume is a shuttle manufacture ring company?) Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 01:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that "Jowett, England" stamped on the lower illustration is a good clue to the maker. Likewise 10/73 does tend to imply they were manufacturing them in October 1973. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Also, describing the contents of our images is not self referential in the context of the guidelines cited. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the caption to reflect maker and date and rm'd the self reference. Not a big issue. I have zapped the {{cn}}s. Just got to write the final stub. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kissing the shuttle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]