Jump to content

Talk:Kirk Bloodsworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dawn Hamilton's relatives should request an exhumation and re-DNA testing

[edit]

Kirk Bloodsworth is her killer, and his case was selected by several corporations related to DNA testing equipment because the biological material that was collected from the victim was extremely minimal for the technology of the time to be test and the results confirmed by an independent retest. In effect, they lied that he was innocent and used him as an advertisement for forensic DNA technology. It is absurd for a person to ask for so little compensation for 9 years in prison with a death sentence, if he considers himself innocent. Here we are talking about a petty psychopath who has been taught by certain people what to say and to whom, so to advertises DNA business of several companies, in return for which he would be exonerated. Relatives must request Dawn Hamilton exhumation and re-DNA testing. 77.85.26.150 (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"DNA fingerprinting" should be changed to "DNA testing" or "DNA profiling"

[edit]

Why is it referred to matter of factly? The more proper term is DNA testing, or DNA profiling, etc.

"DNA fingerprinting" is not the ordinary term for the process that led to his exoneration. charged term, (cf. "Partial-Birth Abortion", "Death tax", "Golden parachute"), invented by those in the prosecution / law enforcement community, who seek to legitimize involuntary DNA testing of ordinary citizens under as many circumstances as possible. The use of "fingerprinting" is meant to downplay the privacy invasion, to liken a DNA profile draw to that of fingerprinting, which broader society has accepted as a relatively non-intrusive action.

Additionally, "DNA fingerprinting" is simply more confusing to the general public. What happened was a garden-variety DNA test, and the use of "fingerpriting" improperly suggests that Bloodsworth underwent some special procedure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.249.215 (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kirk Bloodsworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirk Bloodsworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]