Jump to content

Talk:Kirby Super Star

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revenge of Meta Knight

[edit]

I think in Revenge of Meta Knight as a main game

Your English teacher should be put in jail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.1.247 (talk) 15:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title screen picture

[edit]

I think I need to move the title screen picture, or remove it. I think the way it sandwiches the text (the infobox and picture) doesn't look to good. Anyone have any suggestions? --gakon5 (talk)

Games Order

[edit]

There has been some errors about the order of the games. Great Cave Offensive is available right away and if beaten unlocks Milky Way Wishes. Beating Dyna Blade unlocks Revenge of Meta Knight. If Milky Way Wishes is beaten it unlocks The Arena. Lastly Beating The Areana unlocks the sound test. Some of this info is allready in but it just needs to be organized. Greyhead 17:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, the Great Cave Offensive must be finished to unlock Revenge of Meta Knight. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Odd, when I finished Dyna Blade it unlocked Revenge. But then their is the fact that I had allways finished Dyna Blade before the Great Cave Offensive. Dyna unlocked Revenge, and then The Great Cave unlocked Milkay Way Wishes in my game. I think I'll start up a new file and try beating The Great Cave first and see, what happens then. Greyhead 19:14, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is the order it has always been for me, although I do not know if it is definite, I would assume it is:

Unlocks: Revenge of the Meta Knight: Beat Spring Breeze and Dyna Blade

Milky Way Wishes: Beat all of the original four games, as well as Revenge of the Meta Knight

The Arena: Beat Milky Way Wishes

Sound Check: Beat the Arena.

Although I’ve never tried it, Meta Knight may only call for the completion of Dyna Blade, I will investigate.

I've played this many times, and I can definitavly say (I experimented) that this is the order:
Unlock Metaknight: Beat Dynablade (Spring breaze is not necesary)
Unlock Milky Way Wishes: Beat Great Cave Adventures
Unlock Arena: Beat Milky Way Wishes.

When you say "Beat Great Cave Offense" do you mean get to the end, or get to the end with all the treasures?

Just reach the end. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marx

[edit]

Does anyone know why the final boss of Milky Way Wishes was named Marx? Is it related to Karl Marx? --Acepectif 23:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's supposed to be "Mark". At least, that's his Japanese name. No idea why they changed it, maybe it looked cooler. 208.101.136.228 14:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Japan, foreign names sound very cool to them, like how Japanese names are cool to us. In America, however, giving some celestial being an average name like Mark would be awfully silly sounding. It only makes sense. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Japanese names are cool to us"
No. Japanese names only sound cool to Japan fanboys and (even moreso) fangirls. To everyone else, they sound bizarre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.34.218 (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I've seen the man a lot of times, and even his sliding sprite, but I've NEVER seen Link or Samus, and only Mario once. It should be added that they're the rarest.

You talking about the rock ability, right? I've seen Mario and Samus a few times each, but I wasn't even aware of Link. I think I've seen Mario more than Samus. DeathWeed
I don't think the Link cameo even exists. I definitely recall the Mario and Samus statues, but I never saw Link once. Maetch 18:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That makes me feel bad- I've never seen Mario. But I have seen Samus on numerous occasions.24.5.110.50 03:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby Super Star DS

[edit]

Anyone else hear about this? I've seen screens but just want to check if anyone else has seen it.--Flawful 17:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I have, but I'm not sure if it's real. I guess it probably is, but the placeholder sprites are awfully ugly. XD --Alice2 22:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Kirby Super Star DS', as it might have been called in the past, has been renamed Kirby Super Star Ultra for the American release, has English screen shots, release date, box art, and more. It IS real, and it DESERVES its own page. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does deserve it's own page. There's much more to be said about it than what this article currently says. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.37.110.83 (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still on track for 2007?

[edit]

If this game is still coming out in 2007, it only has to Monday's left to do it. (24th, 31st) JesseMeza (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It can be assumed that with the release of Kirby Super Star Ultra, the games' DS remake, Nintendo may feel that it would be unnecessary to release it on Virtual Console. However, they did release Super Mario 64, so.... 76.175.116.65 (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music Sample

[edit]

The "music sample" you have there is from the Dreamland stage in Super Smash Bros., not from Kirby Super Star. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.99.113 (talk) 03:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This game was released WAAAAY before super smash bros. Yes, that song is indeed from kirby super star, and was not originally from ssb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoieTRS (talk • contribs) 17:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read my sentence again. The version you have listed as being from Kirby Super Star here is the version created for Smash Bros., not the original song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.99.113 (talk) 03:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting the page

[edit]

Who keeps deleting the Super Star Ultra page? Sure there isn't a truck load of information on it yet, but doesn't it deserve its own page? It keeps getting its own page and keeps getting deleted. I know it's 100% official. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

I read somewhere that the name of the remake was Kirby Super Star Ultra.--75.85.111.141

That's the name of the DS remake. --76.71.214.97 (talk) 01:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Article

[edit]

I've found that Nightmare in Dream Land and Super Star Ultra are quite similar. Both are remakes of older Kirby games. But why is it that Nightmare in Dream Land constitutes a separate article from Kirby's Adventure, whereas Super Star Ultra had to be merged into Super Star? Is it because we don't know the full extent of the game's content? Teamrocketspy621 (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also feel that the two should be separate articles rather then the same. --Drkirby (talk) 00:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AgreedGENERALZERO (talk) 02:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unless anyone can come up with a reason not to have a septate article, I will be undoing the blanking of the old KSSU page, removing the redirect, and updating it with the new info we have.--Drkirby (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote an "edit war" message in the KSSU talk page to avoid useless discussion in it, just in case. I really do not understand why some users don't think KSSU doesn't deserve its own article, the "Nightmare in Dream Land" reason justifies it totally.SSBMboss (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It seems the separate article for KSSU keeps getting removed, with many saying "It doesn't deserve it's own article.GENERALZERO (talk) 05:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In many cases, remakes differ significantly enough from the originals to warrant a separate page (see Contra 4 or Bionic Commando Rearmed), however this game is not out yet, and the information on it is sparse at best. I think a good rule-of-thumb for remakes should be to have their title re-direct to a "remake" or "planned remake" section in the main body of the original game until such time as it is actually released. In order for something to be notable (especially as to distinguish it from a prior incarnation), more information is needed in precisely which ways it differs, rather than high-level discussion or speculation about announced new features. My opinion is that the solution to this debate would be to wait until there is more than a paragraph or two to say about the remake before splitting it into its own article. Once there is more information (in the form of concrete examples, screenshots, reviews, etc), I think that a new article would speak for itself. ∴Walkeraj 18:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, for now let's have the articles merged, but when the release is approaching, we can give it a separate article, because by then more information will be revealed. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 18:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for seprating the articles

[edit]

I believe that Kirby Super Star Ultra has enough new content to warrant its own new article, so I am starting this survey on behalf of myself and other who wish to discuss opinions on this and why or why not it should or shouldn't get its own article

Please clearly state your position for the separating of the articles *Support to give Kirby Super Star Ultra its own article, or *Oppose to keep it combined, then sign your comment.

Because polling is no substitute for talking about it, please explain your reasons.

  • Support With the 2 new sub games added (Along with 3 new mini games) updated graphics, added functionality added to the old sub games, such as bottom screen support and two player multiplayer added to Gourmet Race, are ground enough to justify the game to get its own article. In not merely a straight port, and saying that there is not enough new content to have its own article is comparable to saying Kirby's Adventure and Kirby: Nightmare in dreamland doesn't deserve to be separate (It adds updated Graphics, 1 new mode, and 3 new mini games, less then Kirby Super Star Ultra adds), or FE3 should be merged with the FF1 article, since all it does is update the graphics and adds a new chapter to the story.

Also, the large amount of content is lost between merging and making its own article, as exampled below.

--Drkirby (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I support a separate article. Like the SNES article, they explain the story of each sub-game, so with new games added, we put the stories for the "Revenge Of The King" and "Meta Knight Ultra" in the article.GENERALZERO (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I support the existence of the Kirby Super Star Ultra article 100%. Here's one reason why: Kirby: Nightmare in Dreamland has its own article. Why doesn't this game have it's own article then? It has more content than the original Super Star than Nightmare in Dreamland did with Adventure.--76.173.139.63 (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I'm pretty sure I started this whole thing by saying that Nightmare in Dream Land, which is also a remake, warrants a separate article. I propose that Super Star Ultra should get the same treatment. Teamrocketspy621 (talk) 01:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support' - It is real. It's annoying how the article keeps getting merged, it deserves it's own page.
  • Total support - This remake totally deserves its own article. It's so obvious it's making my wiki-eyes bleed of hexadecimal Red color. The KNDL example makes it SO CLEAR. (now I'm wondering if somebody will think something like "Oh, let's make a "this article should be merged in to K's Adv, lol"", this would be pretty retarded) Seriously, the article was just fine as it was, information box, the superb, new, and colorful box art, well, just, let that article live. SSBMboss (talk) 08:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Like everyone else is saying, Nightmare in Dream Land has it's own article, so this should too. Y'know, I don't see anybody having said they oppose it. And this poll started 2 weeks ago. I think it should be put back now. ~m190049 (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I put it back up. And A Link to the Past hasn't been pissing us off for a long while. :-) --76.173.139.63 (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      1. Yeah, I can't say that there's a lot of good faith in not notifying someone involved in the discussion that a vote is taking place. And I can't say that votes don't suck.
      2. Care to explain why this article needs to be separate? A semi-remake with two paragraphs about it does not need its own article. There's never been any assertion that the article needs to exist, merely that these people WANT it to.
      3. "This article does or is this" is not a rationale to do or be what it is. Maybe it should be merged too? Or maybe it simply has enough content to warrant it? Unlike KSSU, it has a new engine built from the ground-up - this is a case of an 8-bit game becoming a 32-bit game versus a 32-bit game becoming a 32-bit game again. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has new sub-games. This means NEW storylines.--76.173.139.63 (talk) 00:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Articles don't become articles because they "deserve" to be. This article can't have a gameplay section because it's the same gameplay as KSS. It can't mention the stories from KSS or describe the mini-games from KSS except for additions or changes. It can't mention any returning music or sound since it's already in the KSS article. All this article CAN have is "changes", new plots, development, and reception. If it doesn't need to be separate from the original game, it shouldn't be separate. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It might be better to wait until it's been out for some time, that way we know more about it so we can write enough to make a whole new article. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I support the existance of a seperate page for Kirby Super Star Ultra. I personally own the game, and there is much, MUCH more that could be said on it. Besides, it's an awesome game. I'd give it 10 stars. Also, super mario 64 DS has its own article, even though it's a remake of super mario 64. Kirby Super Star Ultra should be granted the same.
  • Support: Helper to hero, meta knightmare ultra, capsule J2, true arena, revenge of the king, snack tracks, kirby on the draw, kirby card swipe, and treasures for the great cave offensive. there's all of the differences between the two games. I also agree with the IP user above me. Solar Flute (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby Super Star Ultra: Two new Arena modes

[edit]

What does that mean?--76.173.139.63 (talk) 04:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When was this ever confirmed? Should we just remove that from the article? 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it was. In Nintendo Power's article, they stated the new Modea, but not exactly what they were.GENERALZERO (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are two new arena modes. The first mode is called arena, and is a normal mode where you play as kirby and fight all of the bosses you've seen, like in boss endurance. The second mode is called helper to hero, and it is the same as arena except you fight with a helper. The helper could be any normal enemy, not boss, that has a helper. So for example, your helper could be a waddle dee with a parasol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.37.110.83 (talk) 16:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add the press event?

[edit]

Do you think its justifiable to add the press event done for Kirby Super Star Ultra, along with a picture of one of the Kirby Flogos?

Link to an article about the press event: http://www.wiimedia.com/news/view/kirby_flies_over_alabama_in_fluffy_pink_clouds/

--65.2.92.37 (talk) 03:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:O

[edit]

What, it got delayed a week? How do you know? 66.203.51.193 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Okay, this has got to stop.

[edit]

Someone keeps reverting my edits to this article. I'm here to confirm a few things.

  1. About Gourmet Race being one of the main games rather than a game along the lines of Megaton Punch or Samurai Kirby: Look at the file selection screen of Kirby Super Star. When you first start off, notice that there are six stars in each file. Whenever you complete one of the main games, a number gets added to one of the stars. For example, Spring Breeze adds a "1" to a star, and The Great Cave Offensive adds a "4" to another. In the same manner, completing Gourmet Race adds a "3" to one of the stars, justifying its place as a main game (along with the fact that it adds to the completion rate displayed below the stars). Also, completing The Arena adds a small star saying "EX" below the other six stars.
  2. Someone wrote that there's a scene in Kirby Super Star Ultra where Marx tells Kirby about NOVA. The thing is, this scene already exists in the original Kirby Super Star, and you can see it by going to the Milky Way Wishes title screen and either wait for a short or press the X button. Plus, I added citation to the fact that Marx is responsible for the sun and moon fighting (in the original SNES version, he simply said, "The Sun & Moon are fighting. Go find NOVA," where he said, "I got the sun and moon to fight. I got you to go into space..." in the DS version.)
  3. If you compare the credits of both the SNES and DS versions, you'll see that Masahiro Sakurai was credited as the director in the DS version, and Shinya Kumazaki was credited in his place in the DS version.
  4. Sword Knight is exclusive to the DS version, as he serves as both one of Meta Knight's helpers and a playable character in Helper to Hero.
  5. There are a quite a few "yous" in reference to the reader. Wikipedia in general discourages this.
  6. The major difference to Helper to Hero and the other Arena modes (the bosses were not randomized) was not addressed in the article.

As I was writing this, user A Link to the Past just wrote on my talk page about my edits, even accusing me of ones I didn't make in the first place. If he reads this, he should be able to see most of my justifications. — NES Boy (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, if I want to remove any bad content that you add, I have to painstakingly remove every single instance? Because apparently, you can't just not put that bad content in. That Sword Knight is exclusive to the DS version is absolutely, 100% unnecessary and trivial. You can't tell me that I can't revert your edits because there's a few good aspects to your edits. Like I said on your talk page, you can either resubmit your edit WITHOUT the trivia, game guide content, and original research, or leave it alone. And the header? Why does it have to end? Because you don't want to listen to guidelines and choose to ignore every single facet of quality? I reverted bad content, and if you don't like it, there's not many people who would come to your side to fight against bad content removal. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split

[edit]

Ultra has been out for three weeks. When is it going to be split from the article? 66.194.129.26 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

There is no deadline for it to be an article. This article isn't even that big with the game merged, so I see no compelling reason to split, especially since what's written in this article about KSSU is pretty much the size of what it would be if split, sans development information. Four paragraphs is not an article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right now, it stands as part of an article. If it splits, we could easily gather more information for it without feeling like we're overloading an article about one thing with stuff from another.

I think it'd be pretty easy to get dev. info, screenshots, review information, etc. etc. Pretty easy with google, but I'd (personally) feel uncomfortable putting all that stuff in this article seeing as how KSSU is part of the KSS article. - ~VNinja~ 19:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with KSSU being a big part of the article. The DS version of FFIII is strewn throughout the NES article, and it works just fine. I just don't see why we should split - the KSSU section can be expanded just fine, and the article as it stands is not very long and not very good. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But right now, the 'article' is not an article. The part about KSSU is a little more than a passing mention in the world of wikipedia. I think a split is in good order for the good of both articles. - ~VNinja~ 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's three paragraphs, what will you accomplish by splitting it? The gameplay is exactly the same so the Gameplay section would merely link to this article's gameplay section, the games section would be the same as it is now, and the new sections, reception and development, would add two, three paragraphs at most, which could easily be added on this article. All a split does is make two short articles. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you wikipedia types shouldn't mind if it is small. BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN BLEEDIN SHORTENING EVERY ARTICLE YOU CAN GET YOU'RE HANDS ON THESE DAYS!

Now that I've got that out of my system, Kirby: Nightmare in Dreamland says hi. 66.203.46.178 (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. I'm sorry we remove bad content that should never appear on an article. We'll all suddenly stop improving articles straight away.
  2. NiD is a game built up from the ground-up. It could potentially be merged, but it's not a matter of discussion, because these are different scenarios. NiD can discuss its own gameplay because it has its own gameplay. KNiD is an enhanced remake, KSSU is a remake (barely). - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mr.IP You should seriously quit talking.
That not what I consider improving articles, I consider it removing massive portions of information from articles that previously gave you lots of information on the subject. Do you WANT people to have to go to other wikis to get their information? Cuz that's what's happening, since all the articles are being butchered.
I want people to go to other Wikis for information that doesn't belong on this one, yes. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that's nice. I just think wikipedia should have the most information it possible can, not just what you consider important. 75.185.81.93 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Urm, yes, it is nice, because Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for every single piece of irrelevant information. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Who said it was irrelevent? A whole lot of useful information relating to the articles was destroyed simply because it was deemed not important enough. But that doesn't mean it wasn't useful to people using wikipedia. 66.203.61.65 (talk) By the way, why is it important for my signiture to show what time I posted? —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
This is also an enhanced remake. Did you not notice the enhanced graphics and extra features? Also, why are you thanking him Vninja? I'm on your side. :( 75.185.81.93 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Erm, KNiD was built from the ground-up, though based on KA's design. KSSU has spruced up visuals and remade modes - Meta Knightmare Ultra was just KSS with a new final boss (which is just based on Meta Knight), Revenge of the King is a remake of Spring Breeze with a new boss and a revised King Dedede, and the two arenas are just two twists on the arena. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It may have been built from the groudup, but it is still based on Kirby's Adventure, and that makes it a remake by anyone's standereds. Are you saying a remake of an NES game deserves it's own page, but a remake of an SNES games doesn't? That makes no sence. 75.185.81.93 (talk)

Thank you :). Anyway, back to the point. Right now, you only think that the KSSU article wouldn't expand because of how it is now. Well, the only reason it's not expanding is because of how it is now, merged into a different article when it could easily stand upon it's own. Besides, arguing won't get us anywhere. If we really want to find out if it could, let's split them for a week and see if they both do good. Agree? - ~VNinja~ 00:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, but only on the condition that it's big enough that splitting it off will both not harm this article and that it will grow into an article is sufficient quality that is enough of a stand-alone title. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, why did you guys just throw your conversation into my text? That's just rude... </horridjoke> Anyway, awesome. I'll see if I can get some help splitting it, and I should start soon. - ~VNinja~ 22:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you working on splitting it? - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the split. It looks like two articles taped together. Besdies, we have a seperate article for nightmare in dreamland. Solar Flute (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Citing yourself

[edit]

Hello, I'm the owner of a Kirby fan site, and I compiled a (at least it seems) complete list of the differences between Super Star and Super Star Ultra, excluding obvious new features like graphics, modes, enemies, etc. since those are new additions. I thought it might be a good page to cite somewhere for Super Star Ultra, but I wanted to know: If the page is good, is it okay to cite your own website? By the way, the page is here: http://www.thechaogarden.com/popopopalace/kssu-changes.html 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The site itself is not significant enough to be considered a reliable, secondary source, but besides that, a site owned by you cannot be cited by you due to WP:COI. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh, I see, thank you for clarifying that, A Link to the Past. It's actually a relatively "new" site, so it probably wouldn't be good for citing--that's for major sites. Once again, thanks. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EU Release Date

[edit]

It says 28 November for the European DS release, although I can't see any other place that says this, or has the game. What's the source for this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.25.249.31 (talk) 14:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also wondered about that, thanks for pointing it out. Neither IGN nor Gamekult mention a specific EU date, so I removed it. --Grandy02 (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one (see my IP, I haven't registered... yet) who complained twice about the lack of any EU release date for Ultra by editing the apposite section under its own cover art (first saying "this is taking forever" - or something similar - next to "TBA" and then writing "release date needed" in the same place. Sorry about that, but said lack makes me nervous - just consider how long did Brawl's EU release take. How come nobody knows the PAL release date at all? I hope Ultra won't suffer "Chibi-Robo: Park Patrol"'s same fate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.232.199 (talk) 23:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your complaints are understandable, but please don't use the article for them again. Anyway, I don't know why it takes so long. However, you should keep in mind that several other, more recent Kirby games also were released much later in Europe after their first release. Examples: Nightmare in Dream Land Oct 2002 in Japan and Sep 2003 in Europe (almost a year), Squeak Squad/Mouse Attack Nov 2006 in Japan and Jun 2007 in Europe (also a long gap). The only reason I can think of is that Kirby games aren't that successful in Europe (no comparison to Japan). --Grandy02 (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about my whimsical - and childish - behavior I've shown off before. From now on, I'll keep improving anonymously articles until I get used to edits; then I'll log in and become an official member of Wikipedia. I've made a similar edit about Spyro The Dragon's european re-release date, though in a more serious and mature way, only using a single word, "sadly", to show the need of said date. Now, I don't know how to sign my comment (but I'm the same guy on the comment above the one by Grandy02), so can someone do it for me? Thanks! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.57.27.53 (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Release dates

[edit]

An anonymous user keeps changing the release dates. We should find a source for these so we know what's correct. Gary (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion to remove Donkey Kong Country Shot 2.png and Streets of Rage 2 action.png from this article

[edit]

These two images are meant in their fair use rationales for specifically and only the articles Donkey Kong Country and Beat 'em ups. Use of the images in these articles are not permitted as they

a) do not specify that in their rationales

b) are violating the rules as per WP:F

c) do not contribute or add to discussion to the article (are not necessary).

I will remove them within a few hours, if there is no reasoning as to why they're here. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 03:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I have these pics of DKC and streets of rage is as to augment the reason why they decided to use elements of these games, also I'm going to revert your edits TommyGu (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Augmentation (or what this is, repeating information) using images is prohibited on Wikipedia; they are able to be explained adequately in text form. Most video game articles only have two copyrighted images under fair use: the cover art and one gameplay screenshot depicting as much as it can. Those that have more absolutely require their presence as they illustrate two very different mechanics. The uses of more than one copyrighted image on this article has zero explanation and thus breaks Wikipedia's rules on copyrighted pictures (WP:F). Sorry. Revert will stay in place. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 07:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, you can't just remove improvements templates without acknowledging them. I see that you're trying to improve the article, and I will definitely help out where I can, but please remember the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks! :) ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 08:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fair-use images should be used sparingly. These images don't depict the subject of the article, and they're not necessary to convey that CGI and beat-em-ups were inspirations. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby Super Star Ultra split

[edit]

There was a lot of Super Star Ultra content in this article, so I decided to split them into two and expand Ultra's article. In both talk pages people seemed to support the two being two separate articles, so I did the legwork and now they are. I hope that's okay. Kettleonwater (talk) 00:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kirby_Super_Star&oldid=1239695027"