Talk:King of the Four Corners

King of the Four Corners has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 20, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq High‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

A relevant recent ref on the old babylonian source

https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2017/cdlj2017_001.html Ploversegg (talk) 16:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've added the relevant part from the reference to the article. Ichthyovenator (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meluhha...

'...would probably have imagined them.'

This page reflects an outdated view and does not reflect Sumerian knowledge of and relations with India, Egypt and Europe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.101.145.13 (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then provide a source with the updated view. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

"In the view of the Mesopotamian Akkadians, the term referred to four regions on the edge of the then known world; Subartu (probably corresponding to the region of Assyria) in the north, Martu (roughly corresponding to modern Syria) in the west, Elam in the east and Sumer in the south. To Naram-Sin of Akkad (r. 2254–2218 BC), the creator of the title, it probably, in geographical terms, expressed his dominion over the regions Elam, Subartu, Amurru and Akkad (representing east, north, west and south respectively)."

First, Wayne Horowitz says in 'Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography' (1998: 298) that 'the geographic term 'The Four Regions is based on a tradition of dividing the earth surface into northern, southern, eastern and western quadrants derived from the four winds or compass point directions'. Not a word about identification with specific regions or about 'edges of the world'. So this interpretation should at least be mentioned.

Second, the text in the article contradicts itself. The first sentence says the southern edge of the world was Sumer, the second sentence claims it was Akkad (according to Naram-Sin). The map also shows Akkad as 'the southern corner'. So which is it? If there is a disagreement between sources, that should be stated. For what it's worth, Sumer clearly makes more sense as 'the southern corner' than Akkad - it is farther to the south than Akkad and it's hard to see how the Akkadians could fail to notice it. And Naram-Sin did control it. It's not as if they counted Sumer as part of Akkad or vice versa - after all, they also used the title "King of Sumer and Akkad". However, searching through Google Books, I only find identifications of Akkad as 'the southern corner'. If no source identifies 'the southern corner' as 'Sumer', that version should be removed from the text, but an explanation of this strange geographical blindness of the Akkadians, the Sumerians themselves (since they, too used the title in Ur III times!) and later Mesopotamians would be in order. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]