Jump to content

Talk:King's Road

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

N.B.

[edit]

The 'History' section requires a tremendous amount of revamping: it's full of grammar mistakes, inconsistencies and POV. Deerlike (talk) 04:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additions needed

[edit]

The Pheasantry, World's End, Markham square, Duke of York's barracks, Saatchi museum, flood street, Antiquarius, chelsea old town hall, Cadogan estates. Kittybrewster ☎ 12:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC) king's road is also the name of a motion picture production company which also was involved with film distribution in the eighties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.104.233 (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kings or King's?

[edit]

Grammatically it should be "King's" (or possibly "Kings' "?!). But the Royal Mail directory, and photo of street sign, support "Kings". I've tidied up a lot of incoming links to King's Road so that those which ought to point to Chelsea now do so, and disambiguated some others. It may or may not be right, but is at least now consistent. PamD (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But the London plan document which is cited in the article uses "King's Road" (pages 415-6), and I've now come round to thinking that "King's Road" has to be right and this article needs to be moved from the wrong version to the right one. The Royal Mail seems to have oversimplified it. PamD (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definite article?

[edit]

The article is unable to make its mind up whether it is "King's Road" or "the King's Road". When I lived there in the 70s and 80s it was, I think, usual to call it "the King's Road", but perhaps the definite article is now out of fashion. Either way, oughtn't we to be consistent within the article? Tim riley talk 12:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem as "the" Strand. The lead should mention this variation; it literally was the King's road for several centuries, which is mentioned in the article. All of the other "the"s should be deleted.Radiopathy •talk• 14:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Living at the less fashionable end, we rarely call it the New King's Road. I agree that we should drop the the. Edwardx (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I'll add something to the lead. Edwardx (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How nice to bump into you here, Edward! Thanks for attending to that. I suspect I'll always call it "the King's Road", but that's allowed under the Old Codgers Act. Tim riley talk 18:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed it is Tim. But for your interest in the "the", I might not have bothered. Since our Royal Ballet day, I've been inspired to start several ballet and opera biographies. Plus it's a good way of finding out more about the singers and dancers in forthcoming productions. Edwardx (talk) 09:29, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:King%27s_Road&oldid=1227398012"