Talk:Kholosi language

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing

The sourcing of this stub is abominable. A dead link to an unpublished conference paper summary, and a tinypic(!) link to some map with no source declaration whatsoever. Seriously? This from a Wikipedian who has been around since 2006? For shame.

Fortunately, there now seems to be a real academic publication available on the topic (ToC link): Anonby, Erik & Hassan Mohebbi Bahmani (2016), "Shipwrecked and landlocked: Kholosi, an Indo-Aryan language of south-west Iran", Cahier de Studia Iranica 58: 13–36.

NadirAli: before you continue fighting and edit-warring over links to this (currently worthless) stub elsewhere on the project: get this publication, read it, understand it, and then turn this article into something worth reading; then (and only then) we can start talking. Shame on you for not doing that before. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aspirates etc.

We currently have a table "Lack of contrastive aspiration on stops in Kholosi". But Anonby and Mohebbi Bahmani cite the form hātʰ for 'hand'. And in [1] are sections for initial /pʰ tʰ tʃʰ/ (although there 'hand' appears without final aspirate).

The latter link is informative on other aspects of phonology too, though doesn't actually present an analysis, e.g. romanised a : ā is in fact [a] : [ɔ] with no length contrast. 4pq1injbok (talk) 11:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]