Jump to content

Talk:Kepler-20f

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Closest radius to Earth?

[edit]

Can anyone confirm if this planet still has the closest radius to Earth? Looking at NASA's Exoplanet Archive, I find some planets with the radius even closer to Earth. --Artman40 (talk) 01:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Orbit" header

[edit]

@JorisvS: How come it can't be revised to that similar of what is on Kepler-186f? Would like to know why.. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The point is to have as simple as possible headers that are accurate. That's why they are simply "Orbit" (or "Orbit and rotation", if information on an object's rotation is also included) in the Solar System articles. If the only things about an orbit that can be discussed are its parameters, that's fine, but "Orbit" remains perfectly accurate. I've brought Kepler-186f up to specs on this point. --JorisvS (talk) 18:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but I was also thinking "Orbital elements" to match with the template. If not then we can do just "orbit". --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 19:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The nature of the infobox makes it more specific: only the numerical information can really be listed there. The same is not true of the body of the article, hence "Orbit" would be best. --JorisvS (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kepler-20f. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]