Talk:Katyuri kingdom

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Uttarakhand / History Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

Should this page retitled as Katyuri Kingdom, in line with the infobox? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3 Exactly, the page should be titled about Katyuri Kingdom. The ancient terminology for that Kingdom was "Karttikeyapuri/Karttikeyapura Kingdom" (meaning: city of Karttikeya; Nepali/Kumaoni: कर्तिकेयपुरी) which was dumbed down into more easier sounding "Katyuri/Katyur Kingdom". Dedicated to son of Shiva, the Karttikeya, the patron deity of Kumaon and West Nepal from the cultural aspect- it was a Shaivite Kingdom with Baijnath, Bageshwar temple complexes. Karttikeya is still worshipped and is referred by the name "Karttikeya", "Mohanyal" in both Kumaon and Farwest Nepal. There's a city in Nepal named "Mohanyal" dedicated to this ancient Kingdom Mohanyal_Rural_Municipality.

It holds true that it was a pan Shaivite Hindu Kingdom that ruled over both West Nepal and Kumaon, so it's not just a dynasty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:1A00:B010:13EA:6C35:194F:9D72:7CB9 (talk) 07:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

katyuri Kingdom

According to the Department of Archaeology of Nepal there was a katyuri Kingdom from 12th century to the 15th century in the place of current western Nepal, Kumaun and Garhwal. The Sinja was the capital of katyura kingdom which is currently located at Jumla District of Karnali. After the disintegration of the katyuri Kingdom, present Uttarakhand and Western Nepal divided into many small independent principalities. Those small principalities in western Nepal united to form Baise Rajya (22 principalities) and Chaubisi Rajya (24 principalities). Kingdom of Gorkha was one of the Chaubisi Rajya who started the unification campaign again and took control on Doti, Kumaun, Garhwal and Sirmaur from 1790 to 1805. http://doa.gov.np/downloadfile/ancient_nepal_179_full_1499926508_1594548473.pdf -- 👤Raju💌

protect edit

some anonymous people edited articles and fill Miss information kindly lock article as it is currently Shivamsuryavanshi3000 (talk) 09:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

protect this article

some anti social elements spamer spam the article with khas and try steal history while katyuris are Suryavanshis of Ayodhya it's my request to adminstration to protect this article. Shivamsuryavanshi3000 (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reliable sources for your changes, rather than attacking other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred where I can provide Shivamsuryavanshi3000 (talk) 15:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shivamsuryavanshi3000 Right here. —C.Fred (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred katyuris have proper ancestory from kush decendent shalivahan that prove that they are suryavanshi kshatriya not khas. katyuris language used sanskrit language that used by suryavanshi kings in ancient time they build sun temple that belongs to their ancestors suryadev. while khas are tribals there language and culture are seperate from katyuris. All these points prove that they are suryavanshi not khas and historians like BD pandey also mentioned katyuris as suryavanshi. Inscription of katyuris like padukeshwar inscription mention katyuri as kushvatansh means decendent of suryavanshi king kush. so please don't block me and edit this article and give right information that katyuris are suryavanshi not kush. Shivamsuryavanshi3000 (talk) 06:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that katyuris are suryavanshi not khas

Shivamsuryavanshi3000 (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per what published reliable source? —C.Fred (talk) 12:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]