Talk:Katie Ledecky
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Katie Ledecky article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Endorsement: TYR
[edit]@Chaheel Riens and Kcpohio1:
TYR is Ledecky's first endorsement. As such, it may be important, but, whether or not deemed notable, it is backed by reliable sources, including the Washington Post.
I suppose my issue is that we'd best come to some sort of consensus as to whether it's notable, and, if so, how to word it. Thanks! — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 14:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Javert2113: I'd agree with your first statement - if it's backed by sources other than TYR themselves, then it becomes notable and is ok for inclusion. The Washington Post is a good start. Tbh, I'd go as far as to say it could be added now based on The Washington Post. My initial removal was based on the source being the sponsors themselves, and the terrible marketing prose that was contained within. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Chaheel Riens: Fair enough. I understand completely: best to keep marketing and advertising off of Wikipedia. Now, I'm just not sure how to word it... — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 14:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Wrote a line up. Change it as needed? — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 14:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Photo Change
[edit]I work for Wasserman, a sports marketing and talent management company. We represent Katie Ledecky, and we would like to change the photo on her Wiki page.
Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KFinn11 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Surname
[edit]Shouldn’t her surname technically be Ledecka? 82.4.6.68 (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- There's no "technically" about it. Her surname is Ledecky. 67.188.115.109 (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Although Ledecky has Czech ancestry, she herself was born and raised in the USA, and her first language in English, and she has never used Ledecká as her surname. In such cases, we do not include an older, non-English version of a person's surname in an article. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
2024 Olympics
[edit]I have never commented on here but four sentences to sum up what Katie accomplished at the Olympics in Paris seems unworthy of all significant historical records she attained. I'm glad someone wrote something but just seems that a little more is needed Just my humble option. 73.178.160.241 (talk) 01:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Holocaust Information
[edit]Why is there information that some distant relative died in the holocaust? What does this information have to do with her swimming? 2600:1700:F760:2850:E915:3F87:77A7:6BE0 (talk) 06:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed the section mentioning Katie Ledecky's family losses during the Holocaust. While the information is verifiable and historically significant, I wonder if it is directly relevant to her career and notability as a swimmer. Wikipedia's guidelines on relevance and undue weight suggest prioritizing details that are integral to understanding the subject's achievements. Could we discuss whether this content aligns with those guidelines? 2600:1700:F760:2850:E915:3F87:77A7:6BE0 (talk) 06:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Maryland articles
- Low-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- B-Class Olympics articles
- High-importance Olympics articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class swimming articles
- High-importance swimming articles
- B-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- B-Class Women's sport articles
- High-importance Women's sport articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press