Talk:K. C. Paul

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the K. C. Paul article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: West Bengal Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is something logical . Request to add more Experimental basis claimed by this person.

From some-other internet-resources (graffitis & videos), I see, this person's model about solar-system, is not "classically-geocentric" .

This person speaks, "day-&-night occurs due to diurnal rotation of Earth around own axis ... as matches with modern, Copernican model. But Sun's revolution around the Earth is the cause for variation of daylength & season-change. Whereas old geocentric model claims Earth is totally stagnant- neither revolving nor rotating.".

The modern, standard model that we learn in school textbooks, is ...

In this model, Sun is totally stagnant, & Earth possesses 2 kind of movements: 1. rotation, 2. revolution. Season change & daylength alteration is caused, because Earth is always tilted ~ 66+(1/2) degrees (with respect to the plane of orbit) or ~ 23+(1/2) degrees (with respect to the normal drawn on orbit plane); maintaining a same direction.

Earth's axial tilt is about 23.4°. It oscillates between 22.1° and 24.5° on a 41,000-year cycle and is currently decreasing.

Now, in this person's graffitis , like

Paul's one graffiti, propagating his theory

File:Https://astudentinkolkata.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/photo01461.jpg

graffitti

states a situation, that could be imagined, with just a little change in "frame of reference".

So, these scribbles may be correct or not (I don't know), but follows logic.

P.S: Carnot's theory (on thermodynamics), was originally wrong ... because Carnot didn't knew heat is form of energy. But there was something it Carnot's theory, that revolutionized thermodynamics. A mistake can also contain a truth.

I'll be grateful if more information about the experimental bases this person claims, are mentioned. All the resources, including newspapers & internet, focused mainly about this person's life & social-position. But no-one clearly mentions the experimental findings.

Reference : Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDJtLbEJ8u4 2:43 ->  2:53 (*) -> 4:06

Interested anonymous (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Interested anonymous (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are none. He is not a scientist and didn't make any discoveries. 2001:9E8:4607:3E00:9933:8EF6:D8EA:A390 (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schizophrenic patient, doesn't need wiki.

Schizophrenic patient, doesn't need wiki. 101.50.117.167 (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

Just dropping in from recent changes, but this doesn't seem to meet A7 at first glance. There are multiple articles over the years, even talk of a documentary. --Mlkj (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I don't see there's enough biographical information to be an article about him. The focus is on his nonsensical push of geocentrism. This would be better as a small mention in that article, there's no reason to have a WP:BLP article on this guy. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 14:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]