Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)

K-41 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.

Is it reasonably well written?
A (prose):
Lead: Please change Ottawa to Ottawa County.

At first I asked myself whether "city limits" was proper terminology, but I have verified that Delphos is a full city despite its population and size.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Although not a GA requirement, you might want to change [[Category:State highways in Kansas]] to [[Category:State highways in Kansas|041]] so that it will appear in the category in the same sort order as the other highways.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
I have not seen any problems so far.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Any future construction plans? Any American Recovery Act projects? I assume not.

Would it be worth saying that K-41 is a two-lane highway its entire length?

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Although not a GA requirement, photographs of the highway are always nice to include.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) — P C B 05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]