Talk:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Courts of the United Kingdom page were merged into Judiciaries of the United Kingdom on 18 May 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Requested move 26 April 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Judiciaries of the United Kingdom → Judiciary of the United Kingdom – Standardizing the naming of articles in Category:Judiciaries, this should be singular, not plural. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment this is ambiguously named wikt:judiciary means the body of judges.-- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Alternate rename to Judicial system of the United Kingdom -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. There are three separate judiciaries in the United Kingdom, as England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland each has its own entirely separate judiciary. The plural is entirely correct. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Necrothesp. Also oppose the alternate suggestion above for the same reasons - Judicial systems of the United Kingdom would be the correct title in that format. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Tend to favour the alternative proposed by Thryduulf. Certainly oppose the proposal by Piotrus per the reasons expressed above. RGloucester — ☎ 15:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Proposed merge with Courts of the United Kingdom
[edit]Same concept? {{ping|waddie96}} {talk}
19:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support: Zoozaz1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)