Talk:Judge Advocate General's Corps (United States)

Military history: North America / United States

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Law

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Comments

THIS IS THE WORST WIKI I HAVE EVER READ - INFORMATION FREE - WRITTEN BY IFERIOR SEMI-LITERATES — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:805:8181:37F0:20DB:F82E:7130:ADF (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC) I made a number of minor changes to this page, including 1) clarifying that there is no unified entity known as the "Judge Advocate General's Corps of the United States," only the separate JAG Corps of each service; 2) clarifying that Air Force judge advocates are (technically, at least) line officers; 3) clarifying that judge advocates are not actually "members" of the court but only detailed to it - the members of the panel (non-JAGs) are the members of the court; 4) noting that the one third enlisted rule applies only upon request from an enlisted accused, and applies to special courts as well as general; 5) noting that an accused in a general court as well as a special court may request trial by military judge alone; and 6) noting that judge advocates must be "real" lawyers in addition to their specialized military training. --PubliusFL 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links?

The Army and Navy external links don't seem to work. Regards, Guido den Broeder (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American Brit?

The link from Judge Advocate, a British legal term, redirects here. Is there an article for the British use of Judge Advocate? --Noclevername (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article says that the Air Force doesn't maintain a separate JAG Corps per se, but the AF does have a Judge Advocate General and the wikipedia page on AF JAG (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Judge_Advocate_General%27s_Corps,_U.S._Air_Force) says that the JAG department was renamed the JAG Corps in 2003.Georgia Yankee (talk) 01:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Like many things on wikipedia, this article is only about the U.S when many nations have JAG offices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.145.109 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of article

Shouldn't this article be about the profession of judge advocates per se, rather than the twine staff corps which only some of them in the U.S. (Army & Navy) belongs to, both of which are already covered in their own articles. It would be far better when writing from an international/comparative perspective. RicJac (talk) 20:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

True. There is a disambig page for Judge Advocate General which lists various country JAGs. This page might be retitled Judge Advocate General's Corps (United States), which could then free up the non-US page (e.g., this one pre-renaming) for a generalized article. --S. Rich (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing a USN centric infobox added to this article, I deleted the infobox and followed my own suggesting to set up a JAGC (US) article.--S. Rich (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Judge Advocate General's Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]