This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Several years ago, an article on Doyle was created, then deleted by AfD as not having adequate sources at the time. An article was later (re)created by someone with new and more sources (which I added to). Later, it was tagged for speedy deletion under A7, which was declined. Still later it was tagged for speedy deletion under G4, and several months ago it was deleted per G4 on the basis of the prior AfD (without obvious indication of consideration of the new sources and content which make the article sufficiently different that G4 does not apply). I see an article has now been recreated, again in a sufficiently different and expanded and better-referenced form that G4 does not apply AFAICT, and I have also expanded it with other former content, which had been draftified at User:-sche/Sady Doyle; that page should be histmerged into this one if an admin has time. (And if anyone thinks the article still lacks enough sources, I submit that a new AfD seems like the proper venue for making that case.) -sche (talk) 22:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
