Talk:Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 August 2022. The result of the discussion was merge.

This page was proposed for deletion by Randykitty (talk · contribs) on 19 July 2022.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Academic Journals

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Reg. Notability

Hello, @MPGuy2824, You have marked this page for WP:Notability.

Started in 1957, it is one of the oldest science journals in India. It is also cited, and indexed in various reputed Journals/Libraries/etc., as a Google Scholar Search and Google Search would reflect. Therefore, as mentioned in History remarks [1], it passes C1 & C3 of WP:JOURNALCRIT. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 06:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think Randykitty has done a good job of refuting your points at Talk:Banaras Law Journal#Proposed Deletion Reg.. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion Reg.

Hello, @Randykitty, You have marked this page for WP:PRD stating that Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. A Google search gives 62 hits, most of them issues of ths joornal in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

With reference to above, I request you to please see the above section on the talk page which explains C1 & C3 of WP:JOURNALCRIT.

Further, for me a Google search is showing about 1450 results, which includes citations in reputed journals or by reputed organisations across the world.

This article meets two of the WP:JOURNALCRIT separately, and therefore, I find it suitable to be kept.

Now, therefore, in light of the above, I request you to kindly remove the WP:PRD from the Article.

If you do not reply or act within 6 days, I shall be removing the template myself ex-parte. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 02:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained at Talk:Banaras Law Journal, your arguments are by far not sufficient to meet C1 or C3. Hence, if you remove the PROD, I'll take this to WP:AFD. --Randykitty (talk) 06:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Removing template. Thereby making way for you to AfD. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]