Talk:Journal of Chemical Ecology
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyvio
[edit]I created the page for the Journal of Chemical Ecology. After receiving a robot message concerning copyright issues, I substantially edited the entry.Petercannon usf (talk) 00:26, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Photo description
[edit]I agree with the latest edit. My description of the office location was too vague, leadding one to think that it encompassed the whole building. I have fixed this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petercannon usf (talk • contribs) 16:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've removed it again. WP is not a collection of trivia. --Randykitty (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean about it being a collection of trivia. The description of the photograph was edited to meet your concerns. Any reason why you do not want a picture on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petercannon usf (talk • contribs) 21:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have nothing against pictures in general. A picture of the journal cover, for example, is fine. The journal is published by Springer, meaning that the journal is produced by people all over the globe. The responsible publisher might be based in any of their offices (Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, etc), the people actually producing the journal somewhere else altogether (probably somewhere in SE Asia, where most publishers outsource that kind of work), the editor at USH, his associates in Britain, New Zealand, Germany, and other places, an so forth. So a picture of the entrance of a building in which somewhere there's an office in which somebody may or may not sit who has something to do with the journal? That's absolutely trivial and really not relevant. Some journal editors of other journals work for NIH and are not allowed to use their NIH computers (or time) for that, so they work from home. Should we put up photos of their houses? --Randykitty (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)