Talk:Joseph Favre

Joseph Favre has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 26, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Articles for deletion

13 Dec 2024 – Postcolonial anarchism (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Grnrchst (t · c) was closed as merge by OwenX (t · c) on 20 Dec 2024; see discussion (5 participants)

Good article nominees

09 Dec 2024 – Liceu bombing (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
04 Dec 2024 – Los Solidarios (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
28 Nov 2024 – Alt Llobregat insurrection (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

13 Dec 2024 – Draft:José de Molina (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by MexicanSoda (t · c)

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (513)

A fact from Joseph Favre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the anarchist chef Joseph Favre (pictured) created a "diabolical" vol-au-vent for the Empress Eugénie?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Favre.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 17, 2024.

Pratique

Not "Dictionnaire universel de cuisine praCtique" Maarten van Thiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C01:46C2:1900:55CF:CF80:C7DF:8061 (talk) 07:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Favre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 16:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
Contains a short description which complies with recommendations.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
No original research.
No copyright violations or plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
Neutral.
Stable.
Illustrated, if possible.
Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Points to be considered

Hello, Asilvering. Hope you are well. I have just a few points, including two small changes I've already done.

I think, per MOS:JOBTITLES, that "bishop of Orléans" should be capitalised as it always references Félix Dupanloup in his official capacity, though not in the generic sense when it is only "the bishop laughed". I have an open mind on this, however. What do you think?

I wikilinked Valais as a canton only. I agree that countries like Switzerland should not be linked.

I amended the quotation in the last years section. The reference is normally placed after the colon to precede the blockquote; and in this case it applies to both sentences.

And that is it. This is unquestionably a good article and it passes the review. The man was a culinary genius and I've got an appetite now, after reading the article. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@No Great Shaker Thanks very much! I see what you mean about the bishop title - I'll change that to capitalize it. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]