Talk:Jonathan Allen (journalist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 September 2023 by reviewer Shelovesneo (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Jonathan Allen (journalist) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Jonathan Allen (pictured) left journalism for politics before quitting 40 days later?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Allen (journalist).

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 14:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Allen during a 2014 Q&A with the Miller Center

... that Jonathan Allen (pictured) left journalism for politics before quitting 40 days later? Source: "[Allen] landed a contract job at POLITICO, but eventually itched to get into the political game, and accepted a position with the PAC of Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida. “She basically wanted me to plot her rise,” he said. Allen said he got along with her well, but after only 40 days he realized he wasn’t cut out for this line of work."
Duke University
- Reviewed:

Created by Pac-Man PHD (talk). Self-nominated at 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Allen (journalist); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Will review. Longhornsg (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Longhornsg: are you still going to review this article? Z1720 (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, and apologies for the delay. Copyedited a bit, and meant to return to the nom. Impressively long and thorough new article that was created in time for nomination and far more than meets length requirements. Picture is free. No QPQ required. Fixed some prose in the article based on the lede's source. Article sourcing spot checks are ok. A lot of copyvio overlap, but it's almost all direct quotes properly attributed in the article or book titles. The rest I edited away as much as possible. Tightened the lede by removing "political journalist", as not four words later are the words "politics" and "journalism". Instead of saying "quitting", I think it would be more informative and interesting to say he boomeranged back to journalism. So something like:

* that Jonathan Allen (pictured) left journalism for politics, then returned to journalism 40 days later?

Article assessment

This biography article is well written and referenced throughout. A random check of a few citations shows no "dead links" or "failed verification". While I am not familiar with the topic, the Rater WP tool shows "Class B, or better" at 95-percent prediction. For now, I upgraded to Class C so that the Class-B evaluation checklist can begin. Hopefully, experts can "dig deeper" into the actual content. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 15:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Do I go back and ask for a reassessment? Pac-Man PHD (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. I've reassesed as B. Pac-Man PHD, you can't really ask for a reassessment, assessments are voluntary and decentralized. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 18:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ClydeFranklin I was unsure how that process worked. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]