Jump to content

Talk:John Ratcliffe (American politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Footnoted ‘facts’

[edit]

The intro states: “Ratcliffe made public assertions that contradicted the intelligence community's own assessments,” …. Then gives footnote 16. This is stated as a fact in the into yet the footnote references an Opinion piece in the New York Times. I selected that link to read the article to see if this was fact or allegation or opinion but I could not read the article without paying for a subscription. So two issues. First there is a question about the correctness of this statement of fact, and second why have footnotes that cannot be followed up on….and, I guess, third does Wikipedia at least get a commission if I do subscribe to the New York Times? SteveLew1948 (talk) 16:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

View on the legitimacy of the result of the 2020 U.S. presidential election

[edit]

Shouldn't we add Ratcliffe's view on the legitimacy of the result of the 2020 U.S. presidential election? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 00:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there's WP:RS that discuss it, sure. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]