Talk:John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal (1451)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 10 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 10 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal (1451) → John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal – Unclear why there's a year for disambiguation as this is the only page named John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal. Killuminator (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. This probably could've been done boldly. estar8806 (talk) ★ 13:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The more common name is John, Prince of Portugal. Unclear why this John who died aged less than a month should have precedence over the much more famous later John, Hereditary Prince of Portugal. DrKay (talk) 14:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page for that one is called João Manuel, Prince of Portugal. The year is not a necessary disambiguator. Killuminator (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the redirect rightly goes to the primary topic. In the event of a move, we would be giving unnecessary prominence to the infant. Keivan.f^Talk 18:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Proposed title is ambiguous. Srnec (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.