This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
COI on file, of course -- we're old friends and wrote a book together 30 years ago. I would not have submitted a draft about him except that it is weird for someone who is an ACM fellow, AAAI fellow, and Computers and Thought award winner to not have a Wikipedia page! I can easily add citations for his work on qualitative reasoning, truth-maintenance systems, and model-based diagnosis, I just want to check in to make sure that I'm doing the right thing by community standards. Thank you for any advice you may have. Conser~enwiki (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm about to accept this draft. The sources are primary, and don't therefore establish WP:GNG notability, but I think one or both of those fellowships probably satisfies WP:NACADEMIC #3. If someone feels differently, feel free to take this to AfD (no need to ping me). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
