User talk:Conser~enwiki

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Conser. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Conser~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qualitative Reasoning Group

The article Qualitative Reasoning Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is a notable group, not mentioned at the university so no reason to redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This claim is not accurate, see https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/research-faculty/directory/profiles/forbus-ken.html which points to this page. The group distributes free software that is widely used, including the Structure-Mapping Engine (see https://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/software/sme4/index.html, and https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Structure_mapping_engine).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johan de Kleer (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See also WP:CIRCULAR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Johan de Kleer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for pointing out the reference to Wikipedia. I replaced that with the official IJCAI awards page, which documents that de Kleer won that award in 1987, which makes him notable by Wikipedia standards.

A question for the future: Are people who are Fellows of major societies not notable? ACM, AAAI, Cognitive Science Society?

Thank you for your help. Conser~enwiki (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Conser~enwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind thoughts. I found your comments helpful and clear, so I think I've fixed things. But of course, suggestions welcome. Conser~enwiki (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johan de Kleer has been accepted

Johan de Kleer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]