Talk:Jodi Gordon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Australia: Queensland

	Australia portal Jodi Gordon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This seems ultimately false: "Nickname: Jods Jodels JG". Should it be deleted?

Just deleted some unnecessary and irrelevant material about her character on Home and Away, which was completely unencyclopedic. 124.182.112.72 19:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Rusty8[reply]

The Hoff video

Is she the girl in this video who gets in the car?

No it's not Jodi Gordon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherbed (talk • contribs) 19:41, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wow

omg she is stunning, wasted on home and away!!!!!!! next stop hollywood!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.80.116 (talk) 08:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biker incident, re: cocaine

Media reports have stated she confessed that "cocaine was consumed". Now there were two of them present that day, her mistaken belief that armed home invaders were approaching was said to be due to hallucination - hallucinating due to what? The current version I've edited is an accurate cite of the media reports at the time, it doesn't refer to her consuming cocaine but refers to her alledged disclosure.

Consider also that she hasn't publicly denied to have made this disclosure, nor to have used cocaine (the obvious inference).

Someone else seems intent on protecting her image here. Can I remind all that this is not her publicity bio but wikipedia, accurate media sourced information is permitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.186.96 (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not interested in protecting Jodi Gordon's image. I don't care about Jodi Gordon. I am interested in protecting Wikipedia. Please try to see the difference, and if anyone wants to write about Jodi's recent incident please read our policy Biographies of Living People before doing so. It is very clear in giving instructions about how to deal with biographies about living people and it is not written to protect the subject of the article. It is written to protect Wikipedia. Please also consider this remark "Consider also that she hasn't publicly denied to have made this disclosure, nor to have used cocaine (the obvious inference)." - when it comes to biographies about living people we are to deal only in the black and white facts as reported by reliable sources. We are not, as editors, to say "hmmm Jodi hasn't denied it, therefore it must be true and we'll report it". This is completely wrong. Stick to the facts, and don't try to consider what may have happened, even if you believe it to be an obvious assumption. "Accurate media sourced information is permitted" - yes, as long as it complies with our policies as stated. What I removed did not comply, because it suggested something that was not contained in the article cited, and your opinion that it is a logical conclusion or a small difference, is not relevant. If it doesn't comply, editors are not only welcome to remove it, they are obliged to. The rewording now better fits the media reports. WP:UNDUE may one day determine how relevant it is; it's relevant now, but may not be in a year or so, so it's supposed factuality is no guarantee that it will stay in the article, in its current form, beyond the natural life of the incident. This is how Wikipedia works. And again, I don't care about Jodi Gordon or her image. Rossrs (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jodi Gordon → Jodi Anasta – WP:COMMONNAME is now Jodi Anasta, as the name used exclusively in Neighbours opening titles and promotional materials and most media reports (eg. [1] [2] [3]) since joining its cast in mid-2016. Google news search for "Jodi Gordon" returns 1420 results [4] to 4980 for "Jodi Anasta" [5]. U-Mos (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jodi Anasta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]