Jump to content

Talk:Jim Rogers (California politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This is the first time I'm doing this, hopefully, it's correct. Jim Rogers' name is spelled wrong. It's listed as "Jim Rodgers" and not Jim Rogers. I changed what I could, but I don't know how to fix the main article's title to reflect the correct spelling of his last name. Plus, the name needs to be fix in the lower box.--Tvdir 03:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can move it, actually, as there's no Jim Rogers (U.S.) article right now, but before you do that, someone else should step in here and say whether or not they think "(U.S.)" is the best suffix for the article title. I might lean more toward Jim Rogers (lawyer) or Jim Rogers (politician), as both are more descriptive. (Neither one is taken, which makes them fair game for a non-administrative move, too.)--chris.lawson 03:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Chris. All that needs to be changed is his last name. Does he need a suffix? I need to do a move? Hopefully, somebody can make a decision.--Tvdir 05:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. Anyone can do the move; you certainly don't have to do it, though. :) If no one has made a decision as to the most appropriate suffix (Jim Rogers is a different guy entirely, so we *will* need some sort of disambiguation in the title here) within 24 hours or so, I'll just be bold and move it to whichever one seems more appropriate at the time. (I haven't looked into this too deeply yet.)--chris.lawson 05:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did the move. And went with politician for the suffix. --Woohookitty(meow) 09:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for making the move; I have changed the other sections / links with his incorrect name Tvdir 19:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jim Rogers (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]