Jump to content

Talk:Jim McGovern (American politician)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    very well written. Excellent flow to the article
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sources appear in order
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Hits all the key issues without delving into minute ones.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Could use more images, but that's not a reason to fail GA.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Excellent work. ~DC We Can Work It Out 18:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]