Jump to content

Talk:Jay Bouwmeester/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    One of the better written articles I've seen on a contemporary athlete.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Everything is cited, and all cites are properly formatted with Template:Cite web
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Summarizes concisely, doesn't dwell too much on anything.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: ~DC Let's Vent 03:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]