Jump to content

Talk:January 2013 Northwest Pacific cyclone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article's Title

[edit]

The term's Bomb is unnecessary to describe the cyclone, so I think that the term should be dropped. I think that the name should be changed for something like 2013 Northwest Pacific cyclone or 2013 Northwest Pacific blizzard. ABC paulista (talk) 03:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not notice this, but January 2013 Northwest Pacific cyclone is an ambiguous title. Isn’t Severe Tropical Storm Sonamu a cyclone of the Northwest Pacific Ocean in January 2013? -- Meow 05:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, all other noteworthy cyclones that happened in Northwest Pacific had a name, so it's not ambiguous at all. It's a similar case to the 2006 Central Pacific cyclone. ABC paulista (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's only because no one knew exactly what that storm was; its true nature was highly controversial, even among expert meteorologists. But this system is clearly an extratropical cyclone, and a bomb cyclone, to be more specific. By the way, I don't recall any solid consensus for this article to be renamed. LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Like was pointed in the Talk:November 2014 Bering Sea cyclone, the term "bomb" is not a attribute of the cyclone, since it describes neither the kind (there's no feature meteorologically particular about bombs to differ it from windstorms, nor'easters and others and all extratropical can achieve bombogenesis) nor the intensity of the storm (extratropical can achieve all character of very strong cyclones without bombogenesis). So the term bomb is inappropriate to describe a storm. In the case of 2006 Central Pacific cyclone, even with all its controversies, it had a identifier: Storm 91C. But in both January 2013 Northwest Pacific cyclone and 2006 Central Pacific cyclone, the identifiers and terms fail in the WP: COMMONNAME. ABC paulista (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 2013 Northwest Pacific cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:January_2013_Northwest_Pacific_cyclone&oldid=1207794651"