This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Rajasthan Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Research stations in Antarctica#List of research stations|List of Antarctic research stations]] The anchor (#List of research stations) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

--31.218.143.206 (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)this is not soo interesting[reply]

Untitled

The following two comments were copied over from the article, by Imc 19:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am really not quite sure whether the artefacts we saw (built 400 years ago and looking as good as new!) were constructed to tell the time or to display star signs. One of the devices contained a map of the star system over which was a circular piece of metal with a hole in it. When the sun shone through the hole it pinpointed the star system which at that moment in time was situated behind the sun in the sky. As the seasons changed the angle of the sun changed and so did the angle of the spot light. So I am inclined to believe, because the Indians devote a lot of their time to astrology (not astronomy) and to their future as written in the stars that that is essentially what this park was all about. Not for telling the time in spite of the fact that our guide related to us the story that the larger the structure the more accurate the shadow and the time. . .which logically is nonsense. The broader the shadow the more indistinguishable the pointer and therefore the greater the error. . .surely! (added 25 Dec 05 by 211.30.54.210)

EDIT:

I disagree with the above paragraph. I have been to the Jantar-Mantar in Delhi; and our guide was a much better guide. Infact he was the care-taker of Jantar-Mantar, Delhi. He was a third generation Care-Taker; his father and grandfather before him were also Caretakers of Jantar-Mantar, Delhi. Jantar means Instruments, while Mantar means Observation. Jantar Mantar are Observation Instruments for depicting the astronomy.

If you want to read time, here is the method described. There are two half dials on either side of the dial; one for Summer and one for Winter. The larger one is for Summer; while the smaller one is for Winter. Measure where the sun-rays are falling (the dial markings are illegible now, with the passage of time; so to decipher the smallest measure, in Indian terms 1 unit = 3 finger distance) Now subtract this figure from 90 (90 degree angle is represented by each half dial). Now multiply this by 4. Now divide the result by 60. The quotient of this calculation is the hour of the day (add 6 to this figure, since Jantar-Mantar takes into account that the sun rises at 6:00 a.m. generally).

The remainder of the calculation is the minutes past that hour of the day. This gives you the local time of the city the Jantar Mantar is in. I hope this clarifies the time observatory aspect of Jantar Mantar. For more information please check http://www.jantarmantar.org/ (added 4 Jan 06 by 61.12.42.198 )

Hi, everyone. Being a researcher born in Jaipur, I know that the title we are using is a totally incorrect one. Yantra Mandir is a corruption since:

Jantar comes from Yantra = instrument Mantra comes from Mantra = chanting

Jantar-Mantar = "magic" or "chanting instruments" in traditional understanding. It is true that they have alot of astrological significance since in Hinduism astronomy's chief function was not to tell the present, but the future.

Broken and inappropriate links?

Hi everyone,

the link "The Jantar Mantar Projekt" to http://rohitgupta.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Show+Description points to a "forbidden" page - that is, I'm getting a 403 there.

And does the Kalki temple anything to do with the Jantar Mantar, besides the fact that it's in the neighbourhood? 84.158.239.216 11:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HappyLittleCloud.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links de+fr WP

In the german version thats linked by Interwikis we have one coordinate and will add the others too. Is it possible here to insert the coos too? - I'll like to learn the method to implemeted coordinates here, so I'd like a link to a descrition how to implement coordinates. --SonniWP 21:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jantar Mantar Sundial.jpg

Image:Jantar Mantar Sundial.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 07:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

world's largest sundial?

The claim of the world's largest sundial https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jantar_Mantar,_Jaipur#Description is debatable based on the following: The Vrihat Samrat Yantra, which means the "great king of instruments", is 88 feet (27 m) high

Compare that to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sundial_Bridge_at_Turtle_Bay which says: The support tower of the bridge forms a single 217-foot (66 m) mast that points due north at a cantilevered angle, allowing it to serve as the gnomon of a sundial — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westfalr3 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jantar Mantar, Jaipur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]