Jump to content

Talk:James the Deacon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJames the Deacon has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starJames the Deacon is part of the Members of the Gregorian mission series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 11, 2019, October 11, 2020, October 11, 2021, October 11, 2022, October 11, 2023, and October 11, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England ...

[edit]

Is pretty much a gold standard of scholarship. The entry on James the Deacon is written by Michael Lapidge and Blackwell Publishers (now part of Wiley-Blackwell) is a well respected scholarly publishing house. There really isn't a better source. The entry on James says "Like Paulinus, he was presumably of Italian origin." But this edit inserted information that is not supported by any change of source, and is definitely not in the entry for James that is given as a source. If there are sources saying James "a Roman who lived during the Odoaceran, Ostrogothic, or Lombardic period," they need to be presented, rather than just inserting the information into a sourced sentence that is not supported by the source. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James the Deacon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]