Jump to content

Talk:It's Time (Australian campaign)/Archives/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requested move 20 July 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure)Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 08:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


Primary topic. The song has the most views out of all listed for "It's Time" Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 28 July 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that the Australian campaign is not the primary topic. -- Tavix (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


– This does not seem to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. For one thing, there was an equivalent "It's Time" campaign in New Zealand the same year. Both articles only receive a fraction of the page views among ambiguous articles;[1] they are not "much more likely" to be the topic sought. Cúchullain t/c 13:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

But not outside of Australia. Unreal7 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Also, the fact that the phrase may still be used to refer to the topic does not mean that this political campaign is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term. This is not a question of whether a topic is notable or remaining in common use, but rather a question of whether the topic is so much more important to readers than the other topics that use the same term that it should be considered an overwhelmingly dominant meaning for a term. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.