Jump to content

Talk:Islam in Southeast Asia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wsarvis, Laceyjacoby. Peer reviewers: Lizethvarg0307, Pjbradley1808, Kylaohayon, Tess.lynam.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday, May 16 2013; minor corrections

[edit]

I have made some small corrections in spelling, tense agreement, and other minor errors. Made no change to any actual data and retained author's original wording as much as possible. Jersey John (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spread

[edit]

http://books.google.com/books?id=KzSjL7vxFpcC&pg=PA26&dq=southeast+asia+islam+traders+peaceful&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IrcPU_OZIcXJ0gH90oCADA&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=southeast%20asia%20islam%20traders%20peaceful&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=xiOQdEzgP9kC&pg=PA45#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.co.id/books?id=13PoxT8kufEC&pg=PA514&lpg=PA514&dq=Sultanate+of+Mataram+islam&source=bl&ots=cO3nOEFuqg&sig=3EBb6iswFOShWIeMGdCNRRkFs_I&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SAATU47uOY6WrAfCpYHICw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-What is the significance of the last sentence about higher employment rate (i.e. how does it relate to Islam in Southeast Asia)? -You have done a good job of identifying theories as different perspectives rather than just facts. -Have you considered adding in more information about the wide-ranging beliefs and practices of Islam as it is practiced in Southeast Asia? -There are a few citations that are missing. Also, for the last listed source, who is the author/is it credible? -I believe that according to Wikipedia guidelines, you need to remove the direct quote in the second section and put it into your own words. Laceyjacoby (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Sources

[edit]

Here is a proposed list of sources I plan to use to contribute to this article:

  • Abdullah, Taufik, and Sharon Siddique. 1987. Islam and society in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS.
  • Bruinessen, Martin van. 1987. New perspectives on Southeast Asian Islam? Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 143(4): 519-38.
  • Ellen, Roy F. 1988. Practical Islam in South-East Asia. In Islam in South-East Asia, edited by M. B. Hooker. Netherlands: Brill.
  • Houben, Vincent J. H. 2003. Southeast Asia and Islam. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 588:149-170.
  • Islam, Syed Serajul. 2004. The Politics of Islamic Identity in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.
  • Johns, A. H. 2001. Perspectives of Islamic Spirituality in Southeast Asia: reflections and encounters. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 12(1):5-21.
  • Millard, Mike. 2004. Jihad in Paradise: Islam and Politics in Southeast Asia. New York: Routledge.
  • Nathan, K.S. and Mohammad Kamali, eds. 2005. Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, Social and Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century. Singapore: ISEAS.
  • Ricci, Ronit. 2011. Islam Translated: Literature, Conversion and the Arab Cosmopolis of South and Southeast Asia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Schroter, Susan, ed. 2013. Gender and Islam in Southeast Asia: Women’s Rights Movements, Religious Resurgence and Local Traditions. Netherlands: Brill.

Laceyjacoby (talk) 23:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I am proposing that Spread of Islam in Southeast Asia be merged into Islam in Southeast Asia#History. It seems to be an unnecessary WP:CFORK right now. --NoGhost (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support "Spread of Islam in Southeast Asia" deserves its own article, but right now both the main article and the section are very inadequate. A merge to promote content quality. No prejudice against an entirely rewritten and enormously expanded recreation. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I support all the merge. And because it has been enough time already, I have merged the article. Capitals00 (talk) 05:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Islam in Southeast Asia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Languages in the infobox

[edit]

There seems to be a lot of turbulence in how languages are listed in the infobox. Nothing is being cited for why some languages are listed as one thing, and others as another.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change in subsection

[edit]

Sorry for overwriting your edit @SlackingViceroy. I amended the paragraph, hope this is better. Danial Bass (talk) 20:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Your edits are an improved solution towards the issues I had with the section in the first place. Thanks. SlackingViceroy (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Appreciate it :) Danial Bass (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]