Talk:Iranium

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Neutrality Dispute

I have noted that the neutrality of this article is in dispute, and upon reading the article as it stands, I tend to agree. What would be helpful however, is for the editor who tagged this article to provide a brief explanation of WHY it is disputed, what text, and suggest a few improvements. As this is a new documentary film, source references are few and far between. In the next few days, I'll try and mitigate some of the neutrality issues that I can see, as well as do some grammatical corrections. Edit Centric (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've so far changed the "Censure" (incorrect word, the term is "censorship".) section to something more apropriate, still applicable, yet approaching neutral tones. Additionally, I've added source citations for filmmaker information that was missing before. Edit Centric (talk) 11:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doing some more work on this one, I completely dumped the "Content" section due to a fierce bias and absolutely no sourcing. This alone should move the rest of the article into neutral territory...Edit Centric (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a criticism section, as there are reviews of the film available that question the overall premise of the film. The rest of the article still needs work to reduce POV, such as the presentation of "analysts" in the film as "leading experts".Jemiljan (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the article is clearly not neutral. it starts with the classification of the film as a "documentary film" and claiming that it would "explore", "discuss" and "document" something. this is a pretended "NPOV", a turning of a blind eye towards the bias of the film and it's makers. not in terms of wikipedia.--Severino (talk) 09:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Link Issues

Another issue that was tagged is the lack of other articles that link to this one. Clarion Fund, the other documentaries produced by CF and Iran are some possible links that can be added...Edit Centric (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A link was added to the Clarion Fund page. The film is new so it will take a while, but those are good suggestions Saalam123 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Screening date

According to the article the first screening was held Feb 2, 2011. How is that possible? Does Iran's nuclear program involve time travel, too?

"The premiere screening was held on February 2, 2011 at the University of Pennsylvania. It was introduced by R. James Woolsey, a former CIA director.[4]"

72.144.63.66 (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)David[reply]

Well if one stops to think about this, it is most probably a grammar mistake on the part of the editor. Simply needs fixed, and as far as I can see, that has been TKO already. Edit Centric (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coatrack

the criticism section is a coatrack for an apology for the film. it is suggestive that criticism comes mainly from the iranian regime. the "jay stone" comment is not a criticism but an apology for the film.--Severino (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

also the controversy section consists of that coatrack. --Severino (talk) 09:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iranium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]