The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
"'Ideology of Zionism contradicts 10 commandments of Prophet Moses': VP, Iran for Strategic Affairs". www.youtube.com/@ThePrintIndia The Print (India). 18 November 2024. Retrieved 21 November 2024. Description: 'For over 2000 years, my nation has been a symbol of peaceful coexistence among various religions, cultures, languages, dialects, races and ethnicities, supporting the oppressed, the displaced and those seeking refuge from genocide has always been a trait of my nation in its long and proud history, liberating the Jews suffering under the Babylonians over 2600 years ago, receiving Jews displaced by the Nazis and fascists during World War Two, opening its arms to millions of Afghans fleeing for an occupation and assisting Palestinians, Lebanese and Syrians displaced by aggression and apartheid' said Mohammad Javad Zarif, Vice President of Iran for Strategic Affairs in his statement on Monday.
The nunber of Palestinian casualties is under estimated
on the Wikipedia page for the Gaza - Israeli conflict, it says that 43,000 Palestinians have died in the conflict. Yet here it says 32,000.
Someone should update it for clarity 105.113.41.248 (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion of alleged Iranian disinformation in history section
See paragraph 3 under "History > During the Israel-Hamas war". This section discusses an alleged Iranian disinformation campaign against Israel and has the following issues:
~Seems to suggest Russia and China are meant to be understood as Iranian proxies through awkward phrasing of 1st sentence as well as explicit mention of RT and Sputnik in last sentence. Regardless of the veracity of the disinformation allegations as applied to Russia and China, it beggars belief that either state would view their actions as falling within the scope of an Iran-Israel conflict.
~The purpose of the alleged disinformation campaign is described as "accusing Israel and the United States of committing war crimes in Gaza," but it is in fact the international consensus that Israel has committed war crimes, as the linked "War crimes in the Israel-Hamas war" page correctly describes. "Disinformation" thus seems questionable word choice, at least without further qualification of what information is specifically alleged to be incorrect.
~The following sentence describes Iranian bots as having "glorified the crimes of Hamas," implicitly accepting the framing of Hamas actions as criminal, in sharp contrast to the apparent dismissal of alleged Israeli war crimes in the previous sentence as "disinformation." This is suggestive of an unacceptable editorial slant. 2603:7081:2340:109:8CED:A7AD:A5D4:D359 (talk) 09:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]