Talk:Iowa Highway 150

Iowa Highway 150 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 30, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
August 19, 2012	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / Iowa Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Iowa
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Iowa Highway 150/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 02:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

DABs and ELs are good. (The link checker is choking on some links, but manual checks confirm that they are ok.)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I found a word missing and added it. Everything else looked good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All good here
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
All good here
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
All good here
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All good there.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
With the single fix, I found nothing that stuck out as an issue in need of correction to list this article, ergo, it's being promoted to GA status. Imzadi 1979 → 04:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]