Talk:Iomega

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

San Diego Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Untitled

The iomega.com links are all broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:FB1:C7:684E:A971:1C14:D8D2:7171 (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entry needs to be expanded. No history or criticisms? --24.249.108.133 22:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe an entry of the status of Iomega right now. Eltownse 20:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will get a list of competitors going - can others add to it? Can't believe how hard this info is to find. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David44357 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

acquisitions

Syquest (assets) in 1999.
Nomai (majority of stock) in 1998.

lawsuits

Irwin Magnetics over EZtape
Nomai over XHD disks (zip compatible).

Fair use rationale for Image:Iomega.png

Image:Iomega.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Smells like marketing speak with little substance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.191.129 (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further controversy

Sometime in the late nineties, there was controversy about alleged stock manipulation through artificial hyping in Internet forums.

After a few quick Internet searches, I found no references, but I wish to remember repeated mentions in either the Economist or Fortune, should someone wish to search deeper. 94.220.250.76 (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iomega was a big deal on the Motley Fool message boards on AOL in the 1996 time range. This was the first case of investor hype on the internet as the stock moved from $4 to $5 a share to $30+. Initially there was some solid fundamentals and discussion on the stock, but later as the price rapidly raised, the messages boards turned into a bull/bear debate. I believe this was the first case of massive stock hype by amateur investors on a message board and was an early indicator of the dot-com bubble of 2000. It was a truly an amazing thing and would be good to mention if someone can do some research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.105.1 (talk) 01:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Iomega. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 11:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LenovoEMC → Iomega – Now that neither the company nor its products remain in existence, the name of the article should be the one the company was most known by. And that is Iomega, used from 1980 to 2013 including the popular Iomega Zip drive. The LenovoEMC name was only used from 2013 to 2018 during the tail end of the company's existence. As evidence for which name is better known, raw web search hits for Iomega outnumber those for LenovoEMC by ten to one. It would be nice if WP:NCCORP covered this kind of situation, but it does not, so I think general article titling considerations should apply. Wasted Time R (talk) 14:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per nom. Iomega is the common name. O.N.R. ^(talk) 00:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.