Talk:International House of New York

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International House of New York article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

April 2010

I put in other links to websites discussing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnstonphil (talk • contribs) 22:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute

Instead of edit warring can @Wikiaccount888 and @Saintstephen000 discuss the issue here and find a consensus? If you cannot find common ground you can request an opinion from a third party. Nemov (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your help!

i deferred to the well-researched position taken by the other editor involved.

i thought in an institution such as this notable and older house, the discussed edits fell under recentism and undue, but as i was at the time on vandal copyedit patrol, my edits were probably disruptive. unintentionally.

i encourage anyone with superior extant knowledge to revert any and all,

have a wikipedia day,

Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I apologize for engaging in edit warring. @Nemov, I do not believe what I wrote is inflated or imbalanced, however, I am willing to have a third party look it over if needed Wikiaccount888 (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone made some edits, although I can't tell who. I think they're good additions and make everything more balanced. Wikiaccount888 (talk) 23:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]