Talk:Inter-city rail

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inter-city rail article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: Passenger trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

Worldwide info

I’ve added some worldwide inter-city rail information. Mostly from the Man in Seat 61 site, but also from some of the railway company sites on Wikipedia. The article is far from complete, but it does now cover all continents (except Antarctica, but I don’t think they have any inter-city rail links there!) So should we remove the “limited worldwide view” tag? Fionah 07:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. -- Picapica 11:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. V. berus 21:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Diego train station.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:San Diego train station.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious statement

"Inter-city rail services are express passenger train services that cover longer distances than commuter or regional trains."

Says who ? It is not implied by the plain english meaning of the words, nor by any phrase-defining potentate. In Australia, it's precisely the opposite. NSW Trains "Intercity" services go to places typically 100 km from the capital ( Gosford, Wollongong, Newcastle ), and it's "Regional" services go to places typically 400 km from the capital ( Grafton, Tamworth, Dubbo ). What's more, it is the "Intercity" services which mainly serve a commuter market, not a market distinct from commuters. And I'm sure they didn't make up this confusing, back-to-front, terminology themselves, it all comes from english management.Tallewang (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If that is true, then the word is being used very differently in Australia from its meaning in Germany, Britain, Belgium, etc. -- Alarics (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inter-city in Europe and North America has the same meaning for a longer distance. If Australia is an exception that has a different meaning, you should include the term for Australia in the article with inline citations of reliable sources. Z22 (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inter-city rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317135606/http://www.pnr.gov.ph/mayon_limited.htm to http://www.pnr.gov.ph/mayon_limited.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]